Since I'm reviewing two movies at once (we went to the drive-in), I'm going to keep this short.
Stop laughing, I am.
Yep, we're back where I wrote Coming Attractions.
After watching "Free Guy" and "Jungle Cruise" back to back, it became obvious to me why Ryan Reynolds and Dwayne Johnson have been on such a winning streak of late: They both decided to embrace the silly. Armed with comic timing and a wink at the audience, both men are well aware they've been dropped into universes that shouldn't be taken too seriously.
What that means, of course, is that you either love them or hate them. I love the fun.
In "Free Guy" Reynolds is Guy, which is as much a name as he gets because he's just an NPC--a Non Playable Character--in a popular video game. Every morning he gets up, grabs a coffee, and dodges explosions on the way to his job at the bank, which gets robbed several times a day. He thinks nothing of it, until one day he's entranced by a woman who's one of the sunglasses-wearing elite, the cool people who have no routine and simply do what they please.
Soon Guy's world is shaken when he discovers the elite are video game players, and he's merely one of those background characters whose only role is to be victim, supply items, or simply fill up space. He finds himself falling for the player (Jodie Comer), who's trying to correct an injustice in real life, and they both end up racing to save the fictional world before it's destroyed by its owner--who's ready to go with an entirely new version.
It's been done before, sort of--the first example that comes to mind is "The Lego Movie". Here it's done with new twists, style, great effects, humor--and heart, something Reynolds excels at. It doesn't hurt that there are some awesome cameos, including one by Reynolds' real-life wife. (And another by Dwayne Johnson.)
"Jungle Cruise" is based on Disney's Jungle Cruise, thus the name. The plot? Well, it's the same plot as that wonderful Brendan Fraser movie, "The Mummy". An uncouth adventurer in the early 20th Century is hired to take a female British researcher and her unadventurous brother into a dangerous wilderness, where they encounter supernatural threats.
Which just goes to show you, the exact same idea can lead to completely different stories.
Johnson demonstrates a deft comic timing here, with a talented fellow cast including the real star of the movie, Emily Blunt. His character has been going up and down the Amazon in a small river boat for years and pretty much has everything figured out, until he's nonplussed by Blunt's ... well, bluntness, not to mention smarts. This being Disney, the movie has both the humor and action parts down, and the stakes are high as our heroes search for a plant that might save thousands of lives in the trenches of World War I.
All is, of course, not what it seems. If the action gets a bit improbable ... well, it's a summer Disney flick, so there you go. As Johnson's character says, "Who brings a submarine up the Amazon?" Actually, that quote pretty much sums up the tone of the whole movie.
My score on both films:
Entertainment value: 4 out of 4 M&Ms. They're summer popcorn movies--if you want your popcorn with lots of laughs, over the top action, and dazzling effects, these are two great examples. (Actually, "Free Guy" has the advantage of being mostly in a video game, where over the top action is all too likely.)
Oscar Potential: 2 out of 4 M&Ms. They don't give out Oscars for "Most Fun Movie". Maybe they should.
http://markrhunter.com/
https://www.amazon.com/-/e/B0058CL6OO
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/"Mark R Hunter"
Free Guy is high up on my watch list. It touches some questions that I have been laboring on for some time. The simulation theory for example. Are we all "Guy"?
So - expectedly - the basic idea of it all is not really new. But what is, nowadays.
I don't know the Lego movies, so I would see the closest analogy to Free Guy nay be in something like The Trueman Show. Although that has nothing to do with a computer game world.
Btw., some people had doubt about Reynolds in this role, because he played Deadpool. But I can't see why a actor should not be able to do very different roles. Except Dwayne Johnson perhaps, and Stallone. :)
One the Jungle Cruise movie I will pass, I think. That is to much not new for me. Or I'm just too old for that Disney stuff.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ah, I'll never be too old for Disney stuff! Especially stuff like this, which is entertainment for both kids and adults.
The Truman show was what I originally put in the review, before I remembered The Lego Movie. In both cases the main characters are happy in their situation, before they start asking questions, and in both cases they're basically serving as entertainment for the outside world without having a clue. The Truman show takes it more seriously, but Free Guy does address some of the more serious issues.
As for Reynolds--anyone who thinks he can't play different roles clearly hasn't been playing attention!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit