At the late stage of his work he appeared as a critic of this enslavement of the human technician science. Surely the technique of technology generates the enslavement of a man. Heiliger said that the person as a result there is still under construction. The horse loses his personal or social qualities. He is likened to the object of the world. He stops at the mechanism in this danger In my opinion quite tangible and it's in medicine the value of science But it warns against some excesses arising in connection with temptations the use of fruits I in this sense I agree with you because there really is such a danger There is a danger Not speculatively quite concrete I'll now try to explain how it seems to me what it's about. The fact is that when communicating conditionally speaking we do not communicate with the computer but the communication of the action with the computer and the interaction with the person gratefully differ before interacting with a person is much more difficult there are involved much more degrees of freedom for that with a computer with a tablet with a phone no matter what with Lub th formal up to the system you can perform simple commands a simple sequence yes In order to be successful in a world that is built on technically driven machines on I need to possess not a consciousness highly developed we do not need to know the philosophy in the end it can just be thrown out Yes but because it will not allow But it does not give anything so extreme
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!