RE: NANO Complex Correction More Than 2/3 Complete

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

NANO Complex Correction More Than 2/3 Complete

in nano •  7 years ago 

Haejin does provide overall good information and analysis for people like myself who look at multiple sources to make my investing/trading decisions.

The amount of people actually read his posts and comment on them shows he does have a solid following who are upvoting him. If you have more concrete proof of any wrongdoing please provide it or stfu.

cheers.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Lets see... his rewards are composed nearly 80% by a single user..... So collusive voting, check

He self votes and rarely votes others... so voting abuse, check

He has flagged posts that didn't even attack him for no reason by users that didn't know who he was until after the flagging happened... check

The information presented is faulty to wrong and just bad trading advice, like every long term trader says the same thing about his techniques which is they are crap and don't work... Guess what, they don't.

He is taking a disproportionate amount of the recently claimed rewards that everyone shares, meaning when he takes $300 payouts, my vote is worth less, including my vote to counter his abusive voting schemes...

And so so so much more. You want concrete proof? We have supplied it for weeks, months and got nothing but flags when we were stating facts... So its easier to just spread this stuff, also did you even read the posts provided... They are filled with facts. So shut the fuck up you little bitch before you get flagged to the gray days.