I wouldn't say that experimenting is a waste of time. AFAIK, both Oracles and SMT won't affect the consensus token (STEEM) distribution directly, thus there is nothing to be worried about, and we will be able to determine which reward distributing system works the best.
RE: Ned Scott and @theoretical of Steemit Explore Oracles on Steem
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Ned Scott and @theoretical of Steemit Explore Oracles on Steem
I am simply trying to dispel the notion that "one body one vote" is a good idea. It's not.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah, maybe, but it's gonna be up to the SMT creator to choose a reward distribution system. One may decide to not use Oracles and 'one person one vote' at all.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Under Quadratic Influence, it’s not simply 1P1V. I think we need to acknowledge that’s the actual basis for bringing up 1P1V. The combination incentivizes quality, influential authors and intelligent curation.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
best option imo would be if sp had diminishing returns. I don't think ppl hate stake weighting entirely its just kind of offsetting when people realize that theres only a small portion of the reward pool is even for for grabs to anyone who hasnt been here for over a year
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit