Gross violations of procedural obligations and omissions committed in each investigation since 2014 (1)

in negligence •  5 years ago 

Gross violations of procedural obligations and omissions committed in each investigation since 2014 (1)

http://not.surgery/pliki/Inne/international-law.jpg

In the proceedings regarding the notification of a crime filed on February 28th 2014 (…) law enforcement authorities committed numerous gross violations of procedural obligations and omissions which cannot be called other than a deliberate concealment of a criminal offense, inter alia:

  • (a) Absolutely no investigative measures were carried out aside from drafting a report from my hearing on March 21st 2014 at the District Prosecutor's Office,
  • (b) Initiation of preparatory criminal proceedings and conducting of diligent investigation was forsaken,
  • (c) Appointment of forensic medical doctor–for the purpose of carrying out the appropriate forensic examination and issuing an opinion–was forsaken,
  • (d) Traces at the place of these events, i.e. flat located at Szymanowskiego 5/10 in Krakow, Poland, were not secured,
  • (e) Potential witnesses of these events–including neighbors, owner of the premises, etc.–were not questioned,
  • (f) Acts which are the true cause of these permanent bodily injuries were not classified correctly due to failure to perform any investigative activities, including failure to appoint forensic medical doctor,
  • (g) Motion for prosecution of act classified under article 192 §1 of the Polish Penal code (Conducting medical procedure without consent) was not taken from me, despite the fact that well over 7 days have passed since these events and bodily injuries were still present,
  • (h) Decision refusing to initiate an investigation was issued based on an article from Wikipedia which Krakow law enforcement attached to the case files, claiming that the permanent bodily injuries were caused by the candidiasis of the digestive system!!
  • (i) That decision was never properly delivered to me, thus preventing me from filing a timely complaint–it was delivered via an address box and picked up by a person not authorized to do so (…) The authorization document I signed along with address box rental agreement clearly does not authorize accepting mail from law enforcement in my name (…) So the proper way would be not sign for that mail in my name but to leave notice of incoming mail and immediately inform me about this so I can sign for it myself–but that is not what happened. Alternatively, law enforcement authorities should have delivered that decision to me again since I informed them about this situation numerous times–but that was refused as well.

Sources:

MORE INFORMATION

HOW TO HELP

#criminal-negligence #not-surgery

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!