After the first week of hearings have come to an end, I find myself heartbroken. The only words I find appropriate, to describe what has been disclosed, would be to say this.
than an
epidemic infection of the species
The vast scale of child abuse, exposed within one weeks worth of evidence has been devastatingly laid out for all to see. From day one, the atmosphere has been filled with dread. For those who have made the effort to watch the live streams. You will know what I mean when I describe this observation, to be the same as having had our fingers peeled away from our eyes and forced to watch the scariest horror movie ever conceived.
To be quite frank, I find this whole inquiry, a insult to my intelligence.
Yes, we have had some shocking revelations throughout the week, I grant you that. But I am under no illusion that this inquiry has any intention of making the required changes, or asking the required questions, that are needed to stop this infectious disease. And it is infectious, we are all being conditioned to accept this hellish parallel universe. It has only been 30 minutes since the BBC News have televised a report, about the rejuvenating properties of fertile protein plasma - Protein plasma, in layman's terms, is the blood of the young -.
The BBC, a company given a Royal charter, openly reports on what can only be looked at, as satanist propaganda. And they do this while we have an inquiry into child abuse going on...
(source & link to Dracula's report - https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b09q098k/click-cheating-death)
It isn't just this report, that leads me to make these accusations. And it isn't the fact that I haven't seen a single news report, about the revelations in this weeks hearings - Did you know that they have down-graded the offense of grooming without contact, to a lower priority level? Or that they no longer take the time to search every media device with offensive material on it? Are you aware that the highly trained staff, employed in the most needed positions in detecting child abuse, were all given the option to leave during a "re-shuffle"? No you probably didn't. Because of this lack of interest, shown by our, supposedly, unbiased MSM, these valuable members of staff have now been replaced by untrained, inadequate, imposters and this has had the most tragic of consequences.
And what do you know? Not one single MSM news team has made a single fucking comment about it!!! -
I AM NOT ONE OF THE FLOCK AND I WILL NOT HAVE THE WOOL PULLED OVER MY EYES (nor will you put me in YOUR little black dress. You're not hash-tagging your way out of this one)
So while the MSM have been concentrating their shit-cannon, on other agendas. I have been concentrating my own shit-repellent, on the sham that is the UK inquiry, into the systemic sexual abuse of our children.
For now I have chosen to post links to the live feed, daily. I have not been adding any real commentary to these proceedings because it is only fair that we hear what they have to say. At the end of this theater performance, I will en-devour to cast judgment over the whole inquiry and analyze the evidence in much more detail. But for now, I will only make significant judgments at the close of each week. Other than that I will only be posting the live links, on a daily basis. I would like to give us all time to absorb what is being said and then, maybe, we can have an educated discussion about what this all means, at the end of next week.
Day 1 - The tragic story of Breck Bednar - Evidence given by Breck's Mother. 23/1/18
This gut-wrenching story was one I had previous knowledge of. However I wasn't aware of how the system had not only failed this family, but also how it has done nothing to improve things since. From 1st contact, where glaring warning signs were missed by officers, to damning statements that reveal a total incompetence in the services we think are available to us. The first day was most definitely a Baptism of fire for anyone who watched...
Transcript to hearing held on Monday 22/1/2018 - https://www.iicsa.org.uk/key-documents/3727/view/Public%20Hearing%20Transcript%2022%20January%202018.pdf
( for the full testamony go to - https://steemit.com/inquiry/@article61/uk-child-abuse-inquiry-day-1-heartbreaking-evidence-at-todays-public-hearing)
Day 2 - MR JAMES KARL RIED GAMBLE ( Former Belfast spacial branch and is currently the chief executive of the Ineqe Group of specialist safeguarding companies).
MR KEITH NIVEN (head of safeguarding for CEOP, responsible for the Child Protection, education and missing persons teams. Prior to joining the NCA, Keith was a Detective Chief Superintendent and Head of the Metropolitan Police Service's Child Abuse and Rape Investigation Command)
I would like to add, that Mr JKR Gamble, has been the only person I believe to have entered this room, with any form of honest intent ( Obviously, this excludes the testimony of Ms LaFave ). Judge for yourselves and leave a comment as to what you think about the people who have given evidence this week.
Transcript to hearing held on Tuesday 23/1/2018 - https://www.iicsa.org.uk/key-documents/3742/view/Public%20Hearing%20Transcript%2023%20January%202018.pdf
Next up is Mr Keith Niven. If it looks like a dirty politician and smells like a dirty politician.... Well, you know the rest.....(for the rest of the highlights from day 2, please go to https://steemit.com/inquest/@article61/day-2-uk-child-abuse-public-inquiry-highlights-from-23-1-2018
Day 3 - Chief Constable Simon Bailey - 24/1/2018 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=15993&v=ZikIFhMoVCI
Now I haven't worked out which is more pathetic. It's still a tough call between the demeanor of CC Simon Bailey, or his apparent collapse in the face of adversity and accompanying white-flag (Which came in the form of his proposals to "re-structure" the safeguarding industry to ease the work load). This translates to the downgrading of what were once classed as, serious offenders. One example he gave, was of a call he personally attended. He described how on entering the suspected pedophiles house, they found that he was a recluse who "was just sat with a box of tissues, all day". It is the opinion of CC Simon Bailey that these kind of cases, where there is no actual contact, be given a lesser punishment. Consequently, they would not be sent to the highest level, due to the new, proposed, grading system. Local police services, around the UK, will now be crippled with the leavings of the CPS. Our public services are already stretched to breaking point, with crimes relating to drugs and/or violence. These crimes alone, would keep them more than busy (And they might even make some head-way, if they weren't so determined to rid the world of traffic offenses).
To you and me, it just means he has been told to wash his hands of a large portion of his responsibilities. Not to find a way to tackle every aspect of child abuse, nor to demand that the government stump up the funding needed to do so. No. Instead, the police force wish to just dump this problem on you and I. Perverted minds will be allowed to give credence to the child slave trade, by being left alone to support these sick web-sites. The web-sites will then grow over time and no doubt be strewn with adverts. A lot like much of the non-illegal abusive images that can be found on any mainstream porn site. Call me an old traditionalist, but my idea of a sexual experience does not involve me choking some girl with my Tally-whacker. What the fuck is wrong with people!! ( I forget. This is art imitating life and we must keep that in mind. Because something appears on the web, does not mean it is a reasonable thing to do, they just want us to think it is).
It would take me two minutes to find you a main-stream article, stating boldly, that even to search for these images - and by doing so give need for the industry - is an offense most worthy of attention from our highest ranking officers. But now we are told that this is no longer a serious offense?? On who's authority are they making these decisions?? Certainly not mine.
Transcript from hearing held on Wednesday 24/1/2018 - https://www.iicsa.org.uk/key-documents/3748/view/Public%20Hearing%20Transcript%2024%20January%202018.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=16013&v=ZikIFhMoVCI
Day 4 - Limited details available (Family event so wasn't able to watch much footage that day) - 25/1/2018
One thing that did stand out, was the moment (4:22:15)were the Barrister brought up this point.
29% of cases handed to ICAT's child abuse investigation team( who only receive cases of the highest level of danger), were filed under "No further action".
Transcript from hearing held on Thursday 25/1/2018 - https://www.iicsa.org.uk/key-documents/3761/view/Public%20Hearing%20Transcript%2025%20January%202018.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=14681&v=HUdk6DqbSek
day 5 - Final day of week one's hearings - Assistant Chief Constable Mark Webster, Cumbria Constabulary.
Transcript from hearing held on Friday 26/1/2018 - https://www.iicsa.org.uk/key-documents/3770/view/Public%20Hearing%20Transcript%2026%20January%202018.pdf
I will start my introduction to day five by simply allowing you to read part of the transcripts from Friday's hearing. My intention is to show you how big a responsibility Mark Webster has to deal with. Bearing in mind that Cumbria was stated as, and I quote, " a small force", it seems there is no difference to the depths he has to plunge, in order to dig out the roots. It begs the question, as do all of these videos, is this all set up to fail? Why have trained staff been allowed to walk away and be replaced by unskilled 'anybodies'. Did they not care who took over their work cases?
You not honestly telling me, that these trained officers were made to conclude every single case, before handing their post over, to an ignorant, alter ego? Sorry but that does not wash with me. I don't believe for one minute, that everyone in the agency, before the re-shuffle, was holding back and allowing certain cases to slip through the net.
For whatever reasons people may have had, to allow cases like Melanie Shaw, Sabine McNeil and the Docherty family to be silenced ( just because they have implicated high ranking figures of authority). But even this doesn't make it gospel, that all the agents within the CPS are corrupted.
What is going on within these departments, is anyone's guess. My own, would be to suggest that there are both good and evil people, within the CPS. That must be fact. Otherwise, cases like the Docherty's would not exist. Therefor, I can only conclude that those with good intentions are slowly being pushed out from the CPS, into other departments. Those who choose to stand by their posts, often find themselves being hunted down. Much like they have done with Sabine McNeil and Carol Woods. Both of whom are former social workers, who are now being terrorised by the authorities, after trying to alert the public to what is really happening within the CPS.
If truth was really to be told, these talented lawyers would be hosting this generations 'Water-gate'. Revelation after revelation, would come crashing through societies glazed exterior. Splintering everyone with the shards of broken promises and shattered perceptions.
Reality would certainly change, if we were hearing questions like "So, Mr Webster, can you please explain to the panel why you have imprisoned Melanie Shaw? Isn't she a victim of child abuse? Why is her witness statement not being presented to the inquiry? Why are you all lying and covering up for a network of pedophiles? What do these people hold over you? How have they convinced you to carry out your work in such an obviously self-destructive manner? Why are you crying out for more help, but then turn your back on the valiant efforts made by groups like 'The pedo-hunters'??? WHY ARE YOU NOT DOING YOUR FUCKING JOB!!!!!!!!" (At this point I would have vaulted the table, flying kicked him in the face and finish him off with a Bruce Lee stomp. HYAAAAEEEOOOOAAAAA!!!! And that is why I would never be a Barrister, it would be too tempting)
Highlights from the final day -
So why would anybody think this inquiry will be any different?
So for this week, I will leave it there. It is crazy to think that all of this has been exposed in only one week. I shudder to think of what is in front of us, but you can be sure that when you are feeling brave enough, the evidence will be safe and sound @article61.
NEXT WEEK'S HEARINGS. (I will of coarse be covering all of these hearings, so don't worry, you won't miss a thing)
Whether this is an honest mistake and, again, I very much doubt it to be. This hearing has been tagged into February's category. On the face of it, this should be nothing more than a mundane observation. But when something as important as this is placed on it's own, in a solitary file, I have no choice but to be suspicious.
**Regardless of the motives, I have spotted this unmissable hearing and I will be in attendance and glued to my screen the whole day. This will be of particular interest to my friends @familyprotection. So pen this one in you diaries, because things are about to get real.
I for one, will be listening intently for any mentions of Melanie Shaw, but I won't be holding my breath for that to come**.
These ones, you are not going to want to miss.
Don't forget....
Please visit @familyprotection and if your flush, make a donation. @familyprotection raise funds for helping families fight the CPS. Please show your support and let others know we are on steemit.com
Link to evidence, hearings time-table, transcripts and more - https://www.iicsa.org.uk/investigations/child-sexual-abuse-facilitated-by-the-internet?tab=hearing
PTYAY
Written by Rebel Dan
@markwhittam or @canadian-coconut, I have tagged this under familyprotection as I thought it might be relevant. I understand if it is not close enough to the narrative of @familyprotection so I have put the tag in a place I can edit it out. Just let me know if you want me to remove tag.
I think this highlights steemit.com ability to shed light and bring attention to things like government hearings, well done.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
My thoughts exactly. This is a fine example of the blockchain and how it could be used to store evidence. Cheers for your support bro.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oh Man!, Thanks a lot for this!. I am not in the UK but these info are priceless.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Most welcome :) Yes it is very important for everybody to see this. And it is good to see these people squirm. They all wrote out statements during the inquiry. Most of these statements are very outlandish and I don't think they gave much thought as to the facts behind what they were saying. Now it gets slapped in their face and they can't justify what they have written. I don't know about anyone else but I think I have a good idea about who is acting 'shifty'. You can almost see the red dot on their heads. lol, one wrong word and they will vanish into the mist, bet they are bobbing themselves.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has been upvoted and resteemed by
@thethreehugs
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
i really apricate for your activity.its important for us.
thanks a lot for sharing👍👍👍👍👍.
please keep on dear...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@originalworks
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for giving us a new message about UK Child Abuse Inquiry.We can know a lot of update news from your valuable post.It is a great article.
I will wait for your upcoming post.
Thanks ,sir.
@Resteem & follow has done.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No vote, no re-steem, no integrity. No place for you at steemit.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm really sorry.please sacrifice me.Next time I have never done.Please remove my flag,sir.
Thanks.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Can you tell me why you make comments immediately after someone has posted something? It is very frustrating, I put a lot of effort in to my posts and enjoy reading the feedback. Every time, without fail, there are 2 or 3 comments just like the one you wrote. They are a waste of time as you obviously have not spent the time to look at the content. What good does that do? We can't talk any further about the article and if you have re-steemed it, then you have just re-steemed something, without knowing the content. People like you are bad for steemit. I will not remove the flag and if I spot you on any post doing this kind of thing, I will flag you again. I support the idea of what steemit could achieve and you go against that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit