What could the United Nations actually do?

The United Nations' latest decision does not create any appeal on public opinion or member states. To make peace, the United Nations has taken any action to protect the public or does not seem to have taken any decision of the United Nations. However, after organizing the genocide, the United Nations has shown great efficiency in building a memorial or distributing relief in the war-ravaged areas. The United Nations has now become a global organization of infrastructure development and infrastructure building in war-torn areas.
After World War II, the United Nations condemned the Berlin crisis or the recent Syria crisis or the Rohingya crisis, did not do much except passing the statement and giving a resolution to the Security Council. In 1962, the United Nations had an important role in resolving the crisis in the Cuban missile. But what did the United Nations do in Vietnam or the Korean peninsula? Napham bomar markers still carry the Vietnamese
Security Council has passed a 30-day ceasefire proposal in Syria. Who cares for this ceasefire? Russia was present at the Security Council meeting. But the attack did not stop. Russia gave a five-hour ceasefire opportunity Do militants or rebels have allowed the public to get out of that opportunity? It seems like Russia's security forces are stronger than Russia or militants.
The United Nations has organized a war in Iraq, Somalia, in the name of destroying the war in Syria, not to stop the eviction of Rohingyas, but also to destroy civilians in Libya or Iraq and to destroy mass killings. The United Nations has validated the NATO alliance war in the world. Warlord George Bush and Tony Blair poisoned the boondus with the help of the UN's "Protection of Civilians" The ugly face of Bush-Blair still flicks up in the bloody river of Dzola and Fount. Egypt is not as much interested in protecting the civilians in Libya and Iraq. So, in the last five years in General Sisi, more than 1.5 thousand people disappeared but I do not remember the defense of the United Nations Civil War. Because the interests of the West
Will the United Nations finally enjoy the result of the League of Nations (formed after World War I)? Is the United Nations failed as an international institution? Will be broken or broken? The United Nations has virtually become a part of the divisive and divisive forces of the world. Those who sit in that union will take control of any part of the world, the decision is taken. So this institution could not solve any Kashmir problem. Israel's state was established in front of the eyes of Palestine. Now the Palestine has to go to the United Nations to register the case, I am not a terrorist. We are fighting for the rights of our land. Rather than speaking to the Israeli occupier Israel. It is debated whether the Hamas or the Fatah terrorist organization is in the Security Council. But withholding the allegations of Israeli human rights violations against Israel because of the capture of Palestinian protesting children. Again, fear of getting antisematic accumulation. During the Rwandan massacre, the United Nations was a witness to the witness.
Serb Serbarians led massacre around the world in Serbia. The UN saw sitting The UN peacekeeping force has helped the Serbian forces with fuel oil. Now again the serfs are being punished for the crime against humanity. The question is, if the Serbs are accused of genocide, why would the United Nations peacekeeping Dutch army not be found guilty of supporting genocide to help Serbs with fuel oil? Now is the appropriate time to raise this question.
The horrific humanitarian disaster in Syria has exposed the UN's failure and monotony. But why the UN can not save the common man? It is not possible for the United Nations to save the people. The United Nations holds and enforces the will-the unwillingness of the state. In particular, the UN agency is the polite form of legitimacy to the will of the powerful state. The United Nations, in turn, is a global coalition of winning forces in World War II. Although it was said in the establishment, the establishment of this inter-state body for peace to combat warfare was established. Actually it was the legal process of establishing the dominant power of the victorious power. The UN is in the process of acquiring the world's consent to expand the domination. The Security Council is the area where everyone with power power has accepted the power of voting.
In fact, the structure of the United Nations has errors. The United Nations is not a democratic institution at all. The ability to do some of the world morale passes was not kept in the United Nations. Let's talk about the crisis in Syria. The United Nations will not be able to impose any sanctions or bans against Bashar al-Assad. Because, Russia will veto it. Again, it is not possible for the United Nations to cooperate Bashar with all-out support for militant rebels. Because it will veto the United States or the United States. The fact is, Russia, Iran, Turkey, USA, Saudi Arabia, Israel are openly or secretly fighting their own interests in the Syrian Front. The war will stop after the liberation of these countries. Nobody will win this fight. Nobody will lose Or no one will lose. There will be a peace between the warlords. Peace will come Anyone like Eric Maria Remark will write 'Syria's conquest is completely peaceful'. Or someone like Anne Frank could write diaries The United Nations will fall into the great auspicious reconstruction of Syria. But the Allan Kurdistan will be defeated by the warlords. Thousands of memorial monuments will be built to remember the Ailaan Kurds. In summer or spring swollen swelling will be the Aleppo, Homes, and the mausoleum.
But Alan Kurdis will be ridiculed by seeing the wars, flowers, minarets, reconstruction jokes from beyond. So the time has come to think of the reconstruction of the UN. Immunity from ridicule
Dr. Maruf Mallick, Research Fellow, Center Contemporary Concerns,