claiming that he negligently held the

Doe sued Mckesson, claiming that he negligently held the protest in a way that led to his injuries. A federal district court dismissed the lawsuit, saying that Mckesson was protected by the First Amendment, but a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals panel reversed, stating that because Mckesson's protest was already illegal because it obstructed a highway, the First Amendment did not protect him from civil
http://respiteassociation.org/js/tjp/Eas-v-Jap-Bu-jtv01.html
http://respiteassociation.org/js/tjp/Eas-v-Jap-Bu-jtv02.html
http://respiteassociation.org/js/tjp/Eas-v-Jap-Bu-jtv03.html
http://respiteassociation.org/js/tjp/Eas-v-Jap-Bu-jtv04.html
http://respiteassociation.org/js/tjp/Eas-v-Jap-Bu-jtv05.html
http://respiteassociation.org/js/tjp/Eas-v-Jap-Bu-jtv06.html