I had a group of people in my car today and while I drove them to where they were going, they were catching up. They seemed like old buddies catching up after some time apart. The conversation between them was a lot of fun as they revisited memories and shared stories of what they had been up to over the last while.
Then one guy casually drops that his wife thinks the earth is flat... Not just a general ignorant belief, but part of a group that studies this. I was fascinated. After I dropped them off I immediately logged off work for awhile to read up on this.
The rest of this is a cut & paste I will link to their website..... I don't want the credit lol. Incidentally, we are know to them as globe heads. Or at least that was what his wife would call us, I found no documentation referring to official slang in my reading.
I have never directly copied someone else's work before, this is just my wanting to share something I was really fascinated by. The ONLY changes I made were a removal of a few links, and I added pictures to hopefully make the reading both more enjoyable, and express my thoughts.
Members of the Flat Earth Society claim to believe the Earth is flat. Walking around on the planet's surface, it looks and feels flat, so they deem all evidence to the contrary, such as satellite photos of Earth as a sphere, to be fabrications of a "round Earth conspiracy" orchestrated by NASA and other government agencies.
The belief that the Earth is flat has been described as the ultimate conspiracy theory. According to the Flat Earth Society's leadership, its ranks have grown by 200 people (mostly Americans and Britons) per year since 2009. Judging by the exhaustive effort flat-earthers have invested in fleshing out the theory on their website, as well as the staunch defenses of their views they offer in media interviews and on Twitter, it would seem that these people genuinely believe the Earth is flat.
But in the 21st century, can they be serious? And if so, how is this psychologically possible?
First, a brief tour of the worldview of a flat-earther: While writing off buckets of concrete evidence that Earth is spherical, they readily accept a laundry list of propositions that some would call ludicrous. The leading flat-earther theory holds that Earth is a disc with the Arctic Circle in the center and Antarctica, a 150-foot-tall wall of ice, around the rim. NASA employees, they say, guard this ice wall to prevent people from climbing over and falling off the disc. Earth's day and night cycle is explained by positing that the sun and moon are spheres measuring 32 miles (51 kilometers) that move in circles 3,000 miles (4,828 km) above the plane of the Earth. (Stars, they say, move in a plane 3,100 miles up.) Like spotlights, these celestial spheres illuminate different portions of the planet in a 24-hour cycle. Flat-earthers believe there must also be an invisible "antimoon" that obscures the moon during lunar eclipses.
Furthermore, Earth's gravity is an illusion, they say. Objects do not accelerate downward; instead, the disc of Earth accelerates upward at 32 feet per second squared (9.8 meters per second squared), driven up by a mysterious force called dark energy. Currently, there is disagreement among flat-earthers about whether or not Einstein's theory of relativity permits Earth to accelerate upward indefinitely without the planet eventually surpassing the speed of light. (Einstein's laws apparently still hold in this alternate version of reality.)
As for what lies underneath the disc of Earth, this is unknown, but most flat-earthers believe it is composed of "rocks."
Then, there's the conspiracy theory: Flat-earthers believe photos of the globe are photoshopped; GPS devices are rigged to make airplane pilots think they are flying in straight lines around a sphere when they are actually flying in circles above a disc. The motive for world governments' concealment of the true shape of the Earth has not been ascertained, but flat-earthers believe it is probably financial. "In a nutshell, it would logically cost much less to fake a space program than to actually have one, so those in on the Conspiracy profit from the funding NASA and other space agencies receive from the government," the flat-earther website's FAQ page explains.
The theory follows from a mode of thought called the "Zetetic Method," an alternative to the scientific method, developed by a 19th-century flat-earther, in which sensory observations reign supreme. "Broadly, the method places a lot of emphasis on reconciling empiricism and rationalism, and making logical deductions based on empirical data," Flat Earth Society vice president Michael Wilmore, an Irishman, told Life's Little Mysteries. In Zetetic astronomy, the perception that Earth is flat leads to the deduction that it must actually be flat; the antimoon, NASA conspiracy and all the rest of it are just rationalizations for how that might work in practice.
Those details make the flat-earthers' theory so elaborately absurd it sounds like a joke, but many of its supporters genuinely consider it a more plausible model of astronomy than the one found in textbooks. In short, they aren't kidding.
"The question of belief and sincerity is one that comes up a lot," Wilmore said. "If I had to guess, I would probably say that at least some of our members see the Flat Earth Society and Flat Earth Theory as a kind of epistemological exercise, whether as a critique of the scientific method or as a kind of 'solipsism for beginners.' There are also probably some who thought the certificate would be kind of funny to have on their wall. That being said, I know many members personally, and I am fully convinced of their belief."
Wilmore counts himself among the true believers. "My own convictions are a result of philosophical introspection and a considerable body of data that I have personally observed, and which I am still compiling,” he said.
Strangely, Wilmore and the society's president, a 35-year-old Virginia-born Londoner named Daniel Shenton, both think the evidence for global warming is strong, despite much of this evidence coming from satellite data gathered by NASA, the kingpin of the "round Earth conspiracy." They also accept evolution and most other mainstream tenets of science.
As inconceivable as their belief system seems, it doesn't really surprise experts. Karen Douglas, a psychologist at the University of Kent in the United Kingdom who studies the psychology of conspiracy theories, says flat-earthers' beliefs cohere with those of other conspiracy theorists she has studied.
"It seems to me that these people do generally believe that the Earth is flat. I'm not seeing anything that sounds as if they're just putting that idea out there for any other reason," Douglas told Life's Little Mysteries.
She said all conspiracy theories share a basic thrust: They present an alternative theory about an important issue or event, and construct an (often) vague explanation for why someone is covering up that "true" version of events. "One of the major points of appeal is that they explain a big event but often without going into details," she said. "A lot of the power lies in the fact that they are vague."
The self-assured way in which conspiracy theorists stick to their story imbues that story with special appeal. After all, flat-earthers are more adamant that the Earth is flat than most people are that the Earth is round (probably because the rest of us feel we have nothing to prove). "If you're faced with a minority viewpoint that is put forth in an intelligent, seemingly well-informed way, and when the proponents don't deviate from these strong opinions they have, they can be very influential. We call that minority influence," Douglas said.
In a recent study, Eric Oliver and Tom Wood, political scientists at the University of Chicago, found that about half of Americans endorse at least one conspiracy theory, from the notion that 9/11 was an inside job to the JFK conspiracy. "Many people are willing to believe many ideas that are directly in contradiction to a dominant cultural narrative," Oliver told Life's Little Mysteries. He says conspiratorial belief stems from a human tendency to perceive unseen forces at work, known as magical thinking.
However, flat-earthers don't fit entirely snugly in this general picture. Most conspiracy theorists adopt many fringe theories, even ones that contradict each other. Meanwhile, flat-earthers' only hang-up is the shape of the Earth. "If they were like other conspiracy theorists, they should be exhibiting a tendency toward a lot of magical thinking, such as believing in UFOs, ESP, ghosts, the Devil, or other unseen, intentional forces," Oliver wrote in an email. "It doesn't sound like they do, which makes them very anomalous relative to most Americans who believe in conspiracy theories."
Here is the full article with a few additional links:
http://www.livescience.com/24310-flat-earth-belief.html
Photo Credits:
http://www.aidanleesmith.com/gallery/puzzled-pup/
http://subjectxvi.deviantart.com/art/See-life-through-my-eyes-256326671
http://www.newschoolers.com/forum/thread/499247/Pulling-up-at-a-red-light---?page=2
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-35521558
Ha! I actually stumbled upon this wicked society just a few weeks ago reading about them on Wikipedia. Heard about them before, but never actually paid any attention.
There was one thing in particular that caught my attention of just being contradictory (oh god, there's more but lets stop there :D)
Statement 1: "disc of Earth accelerates upward at 32 feet per second squared"
Statement 2: "GPS devices are rigged to make airplane pilots think they are flying in straight lines around a sphere when they are actually flying in circles above a disc"
Question: Would this mean that the airplanes are also having some kind of "hidden" propulsion to keep them at the right height and not getting "caught" up by the disc? :D
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oh I know. It gets crazy. I particularly loved NASA's role in protecting us from scaling the 150 foot ice wall and subsequent plummeting into eternity.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Didn't think of that, that's just so beautifully made :D
I think someone has read to many of the Discworld books... but there the water just goes over the edge of the disc... pass the elephants and the turtle.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hmmmm!? Flat earth ehhh? I wonder how those geostationary satellites manage to stay in the one spot around 26,000 miles up in the sky, way above the so-call location of the sun, moon and stars around 3,000 miles up. And just what are the geosynchronous satellites orbiting? Are they spinning in circles just like the hapless international pilots? The only difference being, the planes are flying aerodynamically yet the satellites have no atmosphere to do any flying up in space.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Your "logic" has no place here!
Lol... It made me really stunned this is something taken seriously by some.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I guess to some extent everyone has at least one contrarian view about something in the world, but these FE folks seem to have taken one of the most astoundingly disingenuous positions from which to stage an argument.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
They are all wrong, this is the real picture of Earth taken from orbit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I secretly suspected ;)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What I find most puzzling is... copy & paste articles as a blog on Steemit. Aren't we all here mostly because of this culture of bringing value to this special social community? I have nothing against links toward info that supports or explains what someone is trying to share in a blog with others but isn't the goal here to bring something unique of our own... even if only putting together 4 or 5 news articles with opinion to make it a fuller story. But one entirely imported article? Really?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well. There's a lot of talk about what it should be. I know what the expectations are of people, and it's why I made it clear what I did early so people could choose what they did with their vote.
As for the perceived goal.... I'm just going to say I shared something I enjoyed and made it very clear it wasn't my content beyond the story.
The goal is a viable social media platform, I am participating. If that is against any rule, it's one the people have invented, and I reject.
Don't think it receives a large payout? I completely agree, but it doesn't mean we need to muzzle or chastise the participation.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What I am in favor though, is to provide links as comments leading to additionnal info below people's blogs, but that's just me. Sorry, for being contradictory, it's my first time doing so on Steemit... and probably won't be the last. lol
Here is two videos by martyleeds33 about flat earth theory. Although I am not an adherant to this theory, I must say I'm open minded to any possibilities. If you take the time to watch the second video, you might be amazed at what you will find other than flat versus globe:
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit