[dTube] California DEFIES FCC, Approves Net Neutrality Law!
7 years ago by davidpakman (76)
$2.83
- Past Payouts $2.83
- - Author $2.49
- - Curators $0.34
103 votes
- + geofftk: $0.611 (100%)
- + davidpakman: $0.487 (100%)
- + drmake: $0.282 (100%)
- + rambogoham: $0.211 (100%)
- + coinbitgold: $0.192 (100%)
- + bartosz546: $0.130 (100%)
- + mooncryption: $0.099 (60%)
- + onetruebrother: $0.088 (100%)
- + gikitiki: $0.072 (50%)
- + summerskin: $0.072 (100%)
- + meno: $0.061 (40%)
- + mctiller: $0.057 (30%)
- + alanman: $0.042 (100%)
- + waliafridi: $0.035 (20%)
- + tronthetechie: $0.034 (100%)
- + igster: $0.031 (3%)
- + wander-lust: $0.019 (100%)
- + michaelwilshaw: $0.018 (10%)
- + kouba01: $0.017 (100%)
- + followyourjoy: $0.016 (100%)
- … and 83 more
This sounds like it actually enforces Net Neutrality. I know at least one other state is refusing to deal with providers who don't do Net Neutrality.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yep, that's an interesting approach that I also discuss in the video
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This has to be a fucking joke, more statist bullshit to be expected soon!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Which is the statist part, the FCC repealing NN, California trying to save it, or me talking about it?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We should all be focusing on Montana
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Montana is definitely taking an interesting approach to this issue for sure
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
States are the laboratory of democracy. Let's see how this works and if California leaps far ahead in this particular subset of a field it already dominates.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This has to be a fucking joke, more statist bullshit to be expected soon!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
sweet
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Niiice, and we should be able to measure this and hold them up to it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
thanks for News & Dtube clip @devidpakman
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good news. Thanks for sharing with us.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great update thanks for the post
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's a good news.Some people will be benefitted.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank God for California; hopefully all States will soon follow.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for sharing
The real question is
How they will enforce it?
Especially since most of the companies that provide Internet Services within the Golden State are actually headquartered in other states.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
that is very interesting, over here in the u.k were are likely to feel some effects of this
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit