How Dare You Trust Politicians to Save the World? [VIDEO]

in news •  5 years ago 

greta-thunberg-meme.jpg

Many parents are worried about the number of kids suffering from anxiety and depression these days, yet some of those concerned adults feed their children misguided and fear-based narratives about the sky falling.

Yes, the world as you know it may in fact be turned upside down soon, but likely not how you’ve been told!

So what is going on with this Greta Thunberg girl and her environmental hysteria? Is she just a brainwashed actress?

Most people seem unaware that, particularly in poor and developing countries, carbon emissions are more a lifeline to children than they are a threat.

Certainly, any challenges posed by climate change do not require the presence of a global climate dictatorship.

71181921_2214673932163684_2183614085420023808_n.jpg

As Ryan McMaken at the Mises Institute puts it, Thunberg is essentially telling people in poor countries to drop dead:

“Human societies are already motivated to do the sorts of things that will be essential in overcoming climate-change challenges... pursuing higher standards of living through technological innovation is key... but that isn't fostered by shaking a finger at Brazilian laborers and telling them to forget about a family car.”

Of course, rational and sober thoughts on Greta and ‘climate change’ seem hard to come by on social media. By the way, what ever happened to Jeffrey Epstein?

I reflect on all of this and more in my latest walk and talk from Mexico City. Some of the points I make in the video below may surprise you.

Check out the full vlog:

Strange my daughter doesn't get invited to the UN to talk about how politicians are the biggest polluters, taxation is theft, and all governments are criminal organizations!

Fortunately, Anarchapulco 2020 will feature an unparalleled lineup of presenters sharing ways to evolve through personal relationships, philosophy, health, technology, and investments, all among the sun and beaches of a world-class resort.

We just announced our most exciting roster of participants to date, including Dr. Ron Paul, John McAfee, Sherry Peel Jackson, Freeway Rick Ross, and many more!

New speakers will continue being announced in the coming weeks including Cryptopulco, The Dollar Vigilante Summit, Free Your Family Camp, as well as musical guests.

anarchapulco-2020-speakers.jpg

Reserve your space for The World’s Premier Liberty EventAnarchapulco 2020 tickets available at Anarchapulco.com

Subscribe to The Dollar Vigilante on YouTube & follow TDV on Minds, LBRY, BitChute, DTube & Steemit.

jeff-bio.jpg

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Amazing truth bomb here

THIS IS A DISINFORMATION AND PROPAGANDA VIDEO

Why

Here's how I determine if I'm listening to an fossil fuel industry paid liar. First look at his/her background. Is he/she a climate scientist or experienced in a related discipline? If not, forget it, stop listening. Second, does he/she spend a lot of time trying to discredit particular climate scientists, organizations, studies, or activists. This is a judgement call, but if the answer is yes, it's a red flag. Third, does he/she discuss the mountain of empirical evidence that supports the assessment that climate change is an existential threat to all life on Earth. If not, he/she either doesn't know the subject or is deliberately trying to hide or distort the facts.

Some YouTube channels are spreading disinformation and propaganda. I include GWPF, Tony Heller, Sky News Australia, Heartland Institute, Independent Institute, Friends of Science, among many others, in this group, and some of them are in the pockets of the fossil fuel interests. Link: https://www.ucsusa.org/our-work/global-warming/solutions/global-warming-solutions-fight-misinformation

This reference contains a lot of proof. Fossil fuel interests are also "green washing" as explained in the reference. For decades, they have stopped any significance action to deal with the climate crisis. https://www.ucsusa.org/our-work/global-warming/solutions/global-warming-solutions-fight-misinformation

And they definitely knew about it:

Rick Ross? No shit!!!

And biggest pollution makers are China... Yes China. They don't care a bit neither does India.. or so many developing nation's. Asia is a massive pollution swamp. So is most of the middle East.

USA used depleted uranium in Afghanistan and Iraq.. wonder why the birth defects...

Exactly, Jeff! I voluntarily litter pick to get rid of rubbish in the county I live in (having to use a petrol powered van to get to and from the sites and even take some large bits of recyclable waste to the nearest local recycling centre because electric vans would be useless compared to the longer range Vauxhall Corsavan), I make sure that recyclable rubbish goes in the right bin and not in the general waste bins by default, we save on power when we don't need it, we save on using water when we don't need it, we make sure we protect endangered wild animals and insects in the back gardens from nearly every threat there is, we keep typical birds out of the way of traffic, we help to upgrade the cycle paths, we make sure the railways can be up to scratch as they possibly can, we campaign to get cannabis (and then hemp) legalised, we make sure that the trees are protected from logging, I expose how the anti-dog fouling, illegal dumping and littering laws in Scotland are completely useless by way of FOI requests and full research and by the way the vehicles we use are low in CO2 emissions and somehow, according to people like Greta Thunberg & Extinction Rebellion it's not enough?! I may be an environmentalist but I have to say, I have really woken up to the madness being put out there by these globalist shills that are not really there to save the environment, just really to take our rights away under the disguise of 'we need to save the planet!'.

IMG_20190831_193925106_HDR.jpg

33,000 cannabis plants. Cleaning the planet with every crop!!!

Does Jeff grow his own food? I've been doing it for a few years, it's one of the best decisions a person can make.
Here's a relevant research video into Greta:

Here's my replies to the first 7 reasons:

This is a DISINFORMATION and PROPAGANDA video.

  1. Greta is 16 years old and though she is very well studied on the subject of climate change, she is not and never claimed to be an authority. She is simply asking people to inform themselves on the data and empirical evidence presented by the climate scientists.
  2. Nobody is using Greta to do anything. She writes her own speeches and follows her own conscience. True, she has Asperger's, and yet, she is poised, articulate, knowledgeable, and passionate during her public addresses. She's an exceptionally high functioning individual, whose integrity, intellect, maturity, and drive is quite obvious to those who aren't triggered by her youthful appearance and unassuming demeanor, as the speaker in this video clearly is. Breath buddy, come up for air.
  3. Greta is not an enemy of the system, true enough. Thanks buddy, for actually being honest. Greta is not fighting the system. She's trying to awaken the populace and motivate the system to deal with the crisis. Nothing will happen until enough people wake up and push for action from the politicians. It will cost trillions of dollars over decades to deal with the crisis and only governments have that kind of money, so we need the governments' cooperation. If anything, Greta is trying to save the system and humanity from it's own ignorance, dysfunction, and corruption.
  4. Greta is getting a massive amount of media attention. Another honest statement. Greta is carrying and publicizing the climate scientists' message about the climate change crisis, and she's obviously doing great at that. Whoops, now the speaker is saying a bunch of religious BS. I mean - wow, just wow!
  5. Greta has assistants, not handlers, and collaborates with climate scientists. But as I said, nobody is using her to do anything. She is following her own conscience, writes her own speeches, and decides her own schedule. Greta is currently traveling with her father, who helps her with proofreading her speeches. Her assistants help with scheduling events, transportation, etc. So here's a picture of Greta and her parents wearing T-shirts that say "Antifascist." They don't say ANTIFA, do they? I'm also an antifascist, like most people. I thought it was a good thing. If Greta and her father had traveled by air, they would have been bombarded by screams of HYPOCRITE by the triggered ignoramuses, much like what happened to Al Gore, who actually was a hypocrite. Even if Greta and Savante had traveled on the KON TIKI raft, the idiots would have accused them of releasing CO2 by breathing, and methane (CH4) by farting.
  6. People are saying you are insecure about Greta because of her youth and gender. Maybe it's the truth. Have you discussed the science of climate change, at all? No, because you have no argument, and that's why you resort to personal attacks. Anyways, you will make a quick buck off some clueless idiots, which is your main reason for making this video.
  7. Did you just say Greta's mother is pimping out her daughter? Okay, that seals it for me. MORON!
Loading...

The Earth's climate has been, and always will be changing naturally. The sun's energy reaching the Earth's surface (insolation), volcanoes, and greenhouse gases are the main factors in forcing climate changes, and all three are always in play. It's not just one, it's all three all the time. And all three are always changing. When the Earth's orbit moved it further from the sun, as it does periodically, insolation dropped, causing an ice age and CO2 levels had little effect even if they were very high. As the Earth's orbit moved it closer to the sun, insolation increased and high CO2 levels would increase the warming. For the past 10k-11k years, insolation and CO2 levels have been relatively stready, but volcanic activity caused some short-lived climate changes like the Little Ice Age. Since about 1860, CO2 levels started to rise. Around 1950, CO2 levels had apparently risen high enough (300 ppm) to start AGW. And during the 1980's, CO2 levels and AGW had risen high enough to cause climate change. Right now CO2 levels are about 412 ppm and rising 2-3 ppm per year. If somehow we could reduce the CO2 level back down to the 1950 level of 300 ppm, AGW would probably stop and plant life would still thrive. If we had started 30-40 years ago, we might be there today. But, it's too late now.

I'm sure you remember how the tobacco industries hid the dangers of smoking for decades, and even targeted teens with ads that portrayed smoking as cool and sexy. Consequently, countless young people got hooked early and smoked their entire lives until they died from lung cancer. Well, the fossil fuel industries have borrowed the same playbook. They have been hiding the climate crisis for decades, and consequently, humanity will see a era of climate catastrophe unfold over the coming generations. It's already baked in the cake. They have been hiding it through a massive campaign of disinformation and propaganda spread via MSM and YouTube channels. An "ice age is coming," and "the world is cooling not heating" are part of that campaign.

However, the UN and the global elites have known since at least the end of WWII that global warming would lead to a climate crisis. They have also known that our current economic system that depends on infinite growth on a finite planet was not sustainable. They developed Agenda 21/30 as a framework for a sustainable civilization during an era of climate catastrophe. By the time this agenda has been implemented to near completion, fossil fuels will have been used up and we will have transitioned largely to renewable and nuclear energy. The climate catastrophe will depopulate the poorer undeveloped countries. The wealthier developed countries will have institutionalized population controls (two children per family limit) but will not have suffered nearly as much. In 1992, Severn Suzuki gave the world an early warning of the impending climate crisis, but not much has been done since then. That's why we have a climate crisis staring us in the face now. Greta is giving us a final warning. If we act on time, we will end up with a zero-growth Agenda 21/30 society. The alternative is near-term human extinction, probably before 2100.

Dealing with the climate crisis will require a herculean mobilization of industry. We'll need to 1) install carbon removal and storage mods in coal-fired power plants to reduce emissions, 2) build many direct-air-capture plants around the world to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, and 3) restore natural carbon sinks (trees) on a massive scale. It'll cost in the trillions of dollars spread over decades, so governments will need to legislate funding. This won't happen unless the activists led by Greta are able to awaken and motivate enough people who pressure governments to act. Everything depends on the activists.



I have never seen this yong kid videos... and I'm sure I not want also. And I not look tv also kast 8 years.... And I feel more good and free.

Greta is doing an immense service for all of humanity, but many people are needed to fight the climate crisis. The climate scientists have already defined the problem - there's too much CO2 in the atmosphere. The engineers and technicians are developing solutions. The gov't will legislate funding for the solutions if, and only if, the activists like Greta wake up enough people who push for action. Until then, nothing happens. The oil corporations are fighting hard to make sure nothing happens. If nothing happens, we are headed for a climate catastrophe of biblical proportions. That's it in a nutshell.

If you follow any of the following YouTube channels, I suggest you stop because they are spreading disinformation and propaganda: PragerU, GWPF, Tony Heller, Sky News Australia, Heartland Institute, BlazeTV, Philosophical Investigations, and Friends of Science, among others, and some of them are in the pockets of the fossil fuel interests. Link: https://www.ucsusa.org/our-work/global-warming/solutions/global-warming-solutions-fight-misinformation

It's true that the Earth's climate has been changing naturally in the past with hotter and colder periods and varying levels of CO2. That's stating the obvious. There are a number of factors that affect the climate including the sun's intensity, volcanoes, and greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, and any combination of these factors are in play at any given time. The climate scientists have ruled out the sun and volcanoes as factors in the current warming period. Natural changes in the climate occur very gradually, over thousands or millions of years. And while it's true that the global temp has risen only about 2 deg F in 100 years, this is about 170 times faster than in any past natural warming period. This video misrepresents all of these facts.

IMO, the most important topic the video fails to mention are carbon tax and cap-and-trade programs that allow for the continued use of fossil fuels, but at reduced carbon emission levels. These programs are have been successful in a number of countries and a few US states. But, of course the cost to the fossil fuel industry is significant, which is why they are fighting desperately against them, including by putting out bogus videos like this one.

The facts are probably accurate, but the conclusions drawn from the facts are fraudulent and/or misleading, imo. That's how these liars create disinformation. For example, he states that increasing CO2 levels in the atmosphere resulted in increases in farm crop yields. Increasing CO2 in the atmosphere may indeed benefit plant life, but apparently, it's also causing global surface temps to rise. The two effects are not mutually exclusive are they? Better land use practices, fertilizers, and farm equipment probably helped as well. What do you think? He also attributes lower famine, poverty, illiteracy, longer human life expectancy, etc to the use of fossil fuels, which is misleading. All of these benefits were brought about by many factors. He talks about the high temps in the western US back in the 1920-1930. He seems to imply they should not be higher than current temps which are affected by global warming. This is absurd and there are several things to mention here. First, global warming affects the entire globe not just a region or even country like the US. Scientists attributed the higher temps in 1920-1930 to known natural causes, not due to global warming. The human-caused CO2 levels were very low until about 1950. That's when global warming started to cause erratic and abnormal weather. So the period before 1950 or so is not relevant to global warming effects. I could go on, but it's getting long. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/12032015/leaked-email-reveals-whos-who-list-climate-denialists-merchants-of-doubt-oreskes-fred-singer-marc-morano-steve-milloy
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/heartland-institute/

Here it is in a nutshell. The sun, volcanoes, and greenhouse gases affect the climate, and any combination of the three are always in play. Right now, the climate is warming, but scientists say that both solar and volcanic activity are low. Water vapor and carbon dioxide (CO2) are the largest parts of the greenhouse gases, and of the two, only CO2 is rapidly increasing. The great majority of CO2 comes from nature through the decay of organic matter, and nature (oceans, trees) also absorbs the majority of the CO2. The only causes of rapidly increasing CO2 are coming from burning fossil fuels and the cutting down of trees, which reduces the absorption of CO2 by nature. This is what the climate scientists are saying and they are the only people qualified to assess the climate crisis. But, George Carlin was right as well. The planet will "shake us off like fleas" with a climate catastrophe if we don't do anything to deal with it.


Dr Crockford stated, "No climate emergency for polar bears means no climate emergency period." IMO, that's an absurd statement. The climate crisis refers to the climate of the entire globe not just polar bears. And she states that even though the Arctic ice pack has shrunk 50% since 1979, the polar bear habitat is good and therefore the populations are increasing, but she does not explain why. Other scientists, like Dr. Peter Wadhams, also say that the Arctic ice is rapidly decreasing both in extent (area) and volume (thickness). So, ice that was 6-8 ft thick is now only 2-3 ft thick. Seals live on thin ice because they have to be able to dig breathing holes. Therefore, the seal habitat has expanded, resulting in more seals and more food for polar bears. But, as the Arctic ice continues to shrink, so will the habitat for seals and polar bears, and so polar bears numbers will probably peak and then start falling steeply.

Jeff, you have said numerous times that the US government is a criminal organization and I agree. But, when Greta lashes out at government leaders in her "how dare you" speech, you wonder why she is so mad?