I am not anti-liberal news, I am not anti-conservative news. Mostly I am anti-all-news because none of them seem to be at all interested in actually giving real information. I think that in a lot of ways they no longer care even though their viewership outside of a couple of shows is absolutely tanking and getting their butts handed to them by podcasters.
Conservative Brief attempted to fill the void of the massive amount of people that no longer watch "the news" and I hope and presume that a lot of people have tuned out because of the fact that legacy media or MSM simply cannot be trusted.
Conservative Brief is mostly trash reporting while quoting other sources. They remain viable because they post so much crap in a single day that a person subscribing to one of their channels would get a snapshot of all the propaganda of the day in one location, often in very short articles because the average person's mind can't stay focused on anything longer than a Tik-Tok video these days.
src
There are around 20 articles put together each day in this particular propaganda machine and even though I think liberal agencies are far more guilty of this, the conservative side of fake news is alive and well. With Conservative Brief not only are they not overly concerned with factual information but they don't even appear to spell check their articles either.
I don't take anything they say to heart but merely look in there to see what sort of garbage nonsense they will be spewing on any particular day. One thing they love to do is to speculate about whataboutisms and wild things that will never happen such as Liz Cheney going to jail and Rachael Maddow getting fired.
In one of those articles that I was just merely speed-reading, I easily spotted a glaring error in the middle of it.
The far-left network has seen a sharp drop in audience numbers since his ictory, with Maddow’s show suffering a notable decline—falling behind even a rerun of Ancient Aliens in a recent ratings comparison.
Have a quick read of that. Notice anything? This is from their live website also, not some draft and I promise I didn't edit it to make my own fake news.
I did a quick search to see if "ictory" is a word because I don't claim to know all the words but no, it is not. Now I would understand if something like "you" was written instead of "your" because most basic spelling and grammar checkers wouldn't notice that in some situations, but somehow taking a word live that isn't even a word just kind of shows how little CB actually cares about the quality of their content.
They also use a funny yet stupid tactic of including the worst possible picture they can find when they make any article about a liberal
I have no love for Maddow, I think that she is so far down the TDS tube that she is incapable of focusing on anything else. But I would be willing to bet that since she gets paid $25 million a year to have a once a week show, that she probably isn't crying too much about it.
Maybe I am splitting hairs here, but not only is Conservative Brief's article about MSNBC extremely speculative and focuses on very specific statistical points to try to push their point home, but they clearly didn't even bother to read it before pushing it out on the world.
If you are reading Conservative Brief, I sincerely hope that you are doing it for the same reason that I am and that is to simply see how far the lunatics in the news industry are willing to go.
