I am no fan of the New York Times and can't really understand how anyone that is interested in any sort of objective reporting would be. I look at what they publish only to see how far they are willing to go into their trench of ultra-partisanship and they never fail to impress with how much they have gone "all in" on the "reporting" that is far from being journalism.
Despite the fact that they got what they wanted in ousting Trump from the White House and their side now controls both houses of Congress, they still take every possible avenue to try to link the right and more specifically Donald Trump to literally anything bad that happens in the country.
This latest garbage op-ed piece about how people attacking random Jews in the United States somehow benefits the right is a pure example of how the NYT and everyone that works for them is completely incapable of doing any sort of actual reporting.
The author of this piece is a woman (I'm still allowed to call females that, right? Wait, can I call this reporter "female?") named Michelle Goldberg and throughout the entire piece she focuses very heavily on once again protecting Democrats and blaming everything on Republicans or other conservative voices. Of course this is nothing surprising to anyone that knows anything about the New York Times since although they have been a mouthpiece of the left for basically always, at no point in time has it been more evident than in the past 6 years.
src
Maybe you haven't heard about it but in Los Angeles and other places random Jewish people have been threatened and attacked for what is going on in Gaza right now. These people, who were just having a night out of course have nothing to do with that any more than any people of Spanish descent have anything to do with the genocide in South America hundreds of years ago. They, in the mind of the crazy mob, guilty by association. Of course this is in Los Angeles so I suppose things being crazy isn't really so far outside of the normal spectrum for them.
src
I don't like to judge people by their appearances but Michelle looks exactly like I would expect her to given the ultra-partisan nature of almost all of the articles of hers that I have bothered to look up. She has contributed to such non-partisan publications such as Slate, The Nation, and The Daily Beast. Before you go and look up any of these provided you haven't heard of them I'll go ahead and let you know that they are quite far over on the left as far as any political coverage is concerned.
I don't think that anyone with any sort of desire for objectivity actually listens to Michelle but in her recent article instead of condemning the attacks full on, she instead tries to do the usual liberal journalist hack BS and claim that all of this was made possible by DJT. She is cowardly enough to try to attribute her own opinion to someone else as well as is evidenced in this paragraph
These apparent hate crimes are, first and foremost, a catastrophe for Jewish people in the United States, who’ve just endured four years of spiking anti-Semitism that started around the time Republicans nominated Donald Trump in 2016. “It feels like it’s a new front opening up against the American Jewish community,” said Greenblatt.
Take a close look at that statement above. Jonathan Greenblatt is the national director of the Anti-Defamation League in the United States and Mrs Goldberg attempt to put words in Greenblatt's mouth whereas only the statements in quotes were ever uttered by him. I would like to believe that the average reader is clever enough to figure that out but come on now, we all know that most people aren't going to notice.
Michelle Goldberg is just yet another activist posing as a journalist and I think that the NYT is up near the top of the list as far as this sort of activism is concerned. Previous articles written by her (all of which are op-eds) include
- "How Republicans could steal the 2024 election"
- "Why the Right loves public school culture wars"
- "Biden, the world needs your help to stop the pandemic" (100% praise for Biden in this article)
- " Impeachment's over: Bring on the criminal proceedings"
- "Nobody expects civility from Republicans"
- "Is the Trump campaign colluding with Russia again?"
and you could go ahead and insert your own made up far-left title into that list and probably not be too terribly off the mark with another piece that she wrote.
Her latest piece attempting to deflect from how wrong it is to attack anyone on the streets for their belief system and turning it into a "right-wing gift" is just another piece in the gigantic wall of lies that this woman, and so many other "journalist" hacks do on a daily basis. Why anyone continues to listen to them remains a mystery to me - there is no objectivity in this woman's brain or in her words. Every article that she pens, including and especially her recent one, are....
The NYT has been a liberal rag forever. I recall years ago that Bill O'Reily i think it was was arguing with someone on his show as was tradition on his show and was referencing an article in the New York Times and his guest just said "well Bill, it's the New York Times! Of course they are going to say that!"
His guest was a liberal but even this guy realizes that NYT has zero credibility when it comes to being impartial.
Back when newspapers were still something people bought, I recall that the NYT was one of the few newspapers that were readily available in supermarkets here in NC. They didn't sell very well :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit