WASHINGTON WARPIGS - A cold analysis of the hot Idlib dilemma 11 Sept 2018

The hypocrisy of Washington is stunning.

They say that using chemical weapons is a war crime (which it is and should be) and that they will unleash a major attack on the Syrian Army and its foreign allies based on the slightest bit of evidence that chemical weapons have been used.
Once again there will be no investigation but just a knee-jerk response to events that may never have really happened.

Actually, based on intelligence gathered by Russia, several days ago and widely circulated in the independent media, any actual gas attacks within Idlib will be totally contrived false flag events staged by the White Helmets and other terrorists residing in Idlib.
Certainly with victory within its grasp and under the threats levelled by Washington, the Syrian government is simply not about to walk into a suicidal trap set by the United States and actually use any chemical weapons.

However, I’ll tell you exactly who is presently using chemical weapons within Syria.
American military aircraft are once again raining burning white phosphorus down upon the Deir Ez-Zor area.
(See: https://www.rt.com/news/438008-us-strikes-syria-white-phosphorus/ )

Why is this not surprising, coming from a country that used white phosphorus to burn out every last human being hunkered down in Fallujah?
Or which incinerated large swathes of Vietnamese forests and cities, including all the human beings therein, using napalm?
Or which defoliated millions of hectares of foliage in Vietnam with the carcinogenic and teratogenic compound called Agent Orange?
Or used depleted uranium shells with which to bombard Iraq and Serbia, even though this radioactive substance is also highly carcinogenic and teratogenic?

Washington has NEVER had any compunctions about poisoning human beings quickly or slowly to death using chemical substances, even though the practice has been outlawed since World War I.

I’m not justifying Syria using Chlorine or Sarin based on American precedents, I have no doubt that they wouldn’t dream of so doing.
I’m calling out Washington for once again blaming its chosen enemies for its own moral depravities and war crimes.

The big question is: Will the Pentagon swine resort to nuclear retaliation, the ultimate moral offence?

If Russia is forced to defend itself in the Syrian arena by sinking an American warship or shooting down an American fighter bomber, how do the warpigs plan to respond?

It’s a legitimate question because Washington most definitely has been threatening to hit Russian assets (in addition to Syrian and Iranian ones) to mitigate any attacks on the terrorist strongholds in Idlib.

Given my lifetime of experience of US aggression and perpetual warmongering while claiming to be the "good guys" I have no doubt what the answer to my question would be.
They would not think twice and would relish the opportunity.
They truly are THAT insane and THAT obedient to their Black Nobility commanders.

Further enlightenment to the true source of the aggression can be considered here:
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2018/09/10/skripal-and-syria-imperative-criminalizing-russia.html