Count Dankula Freed - Fined £800

in news •  7 years ago  (edited)

dank2.jpg
Source

Count Dankula - real name Mark Meechan - was in a Scottish court today as mentioned in this post by @someguy123 yesterday. He was charged with a 'hate crime' for uploading a video on Youtube of him teaching his girlfriend's pug Buddha to do a Nazi salute in response to verbal commands such as 'Seig Heil' and 'gas the Jews'.

Citing the Communications Act Sherriff Derek O'Carroll decreed that the video was 'grossly offensive' and called it 'anti-Semetic and racist in nature' and was fueled by 'religious prejudice', despite nobody from the Jewish community lodging a complaint.

Meechan apologised to the Jewish community for any offence caused and he was fined £800 - roughly $1,115 - after his defence lawyer stated:

His difficulty, it seems, was that he was someone who enjoyed shock humour, both giving and receiving it, and went about his life under the impression that he lived in a jurisdiction which permitted its citizens the right to freely express themselves.
Source

Vowing to appeal the sentence, Dankula said the following outside court:

... it does set a precedent, a really, really dangerous precedent has been set for people to say things, their context to be completely ignored and then they can be convicted for it. You don’t get to decide the context of what you said, other people don’t get to, the court gets to, that’s dangerous.
Source

He had many supporters outside Airdrie Sherriff Court, including the infamous Tony Robinson. A free speech protest march also took place in London today.

Count-Dankula-protest-1308712.jpg
Source

Naturally the usual suspects in the British media see this as a 'far-right' issue, typified in this charming paragraph courtesy of The Independent. I suppose anybody who stands for free speech is now far-right. Right?

Capture.PNG
Source

Was the video tasteless? Of course, nobody is disputing that. But as Dankula stated, the entire point of it was the juxtaposition of a cute fluffy animal doing something so shocking. I am only shocked that poor Buddha the pug - notice how THAT'S not deemed offensive to Buddhists? - was not also dragged in front of a judge. When seeing a joke such as this, the subject of the joke - the extermination of the Jews in WWII - is not what is deemed funny. Nobody with any sense would claim it was. History is filled with atrocities, disasters and other terrible events. Are these ALL off limits? As comedian Ricky Gervais once said 'If you can't joke about the most horrendous things in the world, what's the point of jokes? What's the point in having humor? Humor is to get us over terrible things.'

Let me reiterate: I do not find the terrible events of WWII funny. Seeing a pug do a Nazi salute? That's another story.


Are you a writer or keen to learn? Do you wish to join a community of like-minded individuals who can help hone your writing skills in the fields of fiction, non-fiction, technical, poetry, or songwriting? Join us at The Writers' Block by clicking the logo below.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Great news....

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

OK - i'm here again to educate it seems.

The guy was an idiot, and deserves the fine. He was using hate speech - "Gas the Jews" is a direct and crass reference to the Holocaust, in which 6 million were murdered. Its not something you make light of, and if you need a reminder of the human cost I suggest reading the final pages of Vassily Grossman's excellent 'Life and Fate'. In a harrowing passage he describes the final moments in a gas chamber, when a mother is holding her child close, as Zyklon B pours over them. This was a reality for 6 million, and is not something you make light of to a dog, or for a few likes on Youtube.

If you want to joke about it, then do it with your meathead friends behind closed doors. Once you put that on social media, you own it, and you have to stand by what you say. 'For the laughs' doesnt really cut it in this case. Its chumpish ignorance on display here, not malice, but why should such gross ignorance be tolerated?

Yes, we know what it was in reference to. No, it was not a good time for the Jewish community. I need no education on the horrors perpetrated, I am quite aware of what happened.

If you accept there should be free speech, you cannot be selective who gets to use the privilege.

As far as I know, the UK has nothing analogous to America’s First Amendment. So what might be the legal basis for an appeal?