![]
Federal regulators are expected to vote Thursday to repeal Obama-era net neutrality rules for internet traffic. It would be a major victory for telecommunications companies and another milestone for the Republican deregulation push under President Trump.
The anticipated 3-2 party-line vote by the Federal Communications Commission would tear down the controversial utility-like oversight of internet service providers that was put in place by Democrats in 2015 to try to ensure the uninhibited flow of data online.
Watch live: FCC votes on net neutrality »
That strict regulatory structure would largely give way to market forces. After a repeal of net neutrality rules, internet service providers would be required only to disclose their online practices, with the Federal Trade Commission policing them for anti-competitive practices.
Republicans said they are simply restoring government oversight of the internet to where it was before 2015, reestablishing the light-touch regulatory approach that allowed the online ecosystem to flourish and develop into an economic force.
“Under my proposal, the federal government will stop micromanaging the internet,” Ajit Pai, the Republican who took over as FCC chairman in January, said in unveiling the repeal proposal last month.
He and other opponents of the rules said the rules have led to reduced investment in broadband networks — a point net neutrality supporters dispute.
Democrats — urged on by consumer advocates, digital rights groups and online giants such as Amazon, Google and Facebook — said the tougher federal oversight is needed because the internet’s increasingly vital role in business and daily life is vulnerable to exploitation by telecom companies.
“Our internet economy is the envy of the world because it is open to all. This proposal tears at the foundation of that openness,” said Jessica Rosenworcel, one of two Democrats on the five-member FCC expected to vote against the repeal.
The FCC’s net neutrality rules prohibit AT&T Inc., Charter Communications Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and other broadband and wireless internet service providers from selling faster delivery of certain data, slowing speeds for specific video streams and other content, and blocking or otherwise discriminating against any legal online material.
To enforce the rules, the FCC classified broadband as a more highly regulated utility-like service under Title 2 of federal telecommunications law.
AT&T, other telecom companies and industry trade groups sued to block the rules, arguing that the FCC exceeded its authority in approving the regulations. But a federal appeals court upheld the regulations last year.
Supporters of net neutrality are expected to file suit to try to halt the repeal plan, arguing that the FCC’s about-face just two years after the regulations were enacted is an “arbitrary and capricious” move that violates the Administrative Procedures Act.
Telecom companies said they are committed to the principles of net neutrality and have no plans to change their practices.
“None of the fire-and-brimstone predictions will come to pass,” said Michael Powell, president of NCTA — the Internet & Television Assn., a trade group that includes cable companies. “The nation’s broadband providers have lived the principles of net neutrality for years.”
But the companies have hedged on whether they would start charging additional fees to transport video streams or other content at a higher speed through their network in a practice known as paid prioritization.
Pai has said paid prioritization could accelerate the development of autonomous vehicles and home health monitoring, which would need reliably fast service.
But net neutrality supporters worry telecom companies will set up toll lanes on the internet, cutting deals with some websites to deliver their content faster and squeezing out start-ups and small companies that lack the money to pay for faster service.
Thursday’s vote was the latest battle in a war that dates to 2003 over how to ensure the internet remains an open network. Over the years, net neutrality has become a rallying cry for liberals and online activists concerned that telecom companies would become powerful gatekeepers for the communications platform of the 21st century.
Nearly 24 million online comments on both sides of the issue flooded the FCC this year as it reconsidered its net neutrality regulations. Highlighting the contentious stakes in the fight, millions of those comments appear to be fakes, with some originating from Russia.
Dozens of protesters rallied outside the FCC’s headquarters Thursday morning, and demonstrations urging the agency to keep its net neutrality regulations have taken place across the country and online in recent months. Pai’s home in the Washington suburbs has been targeted, and he has said his family has been harassed.
View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter
Jim Puzzanghera
✔
@JimPuzzanghera
Dozens of net neutrality supporters demonstrate outside FCC headquarters ahead of today’s repeal vote.
3:41 PM - Dec 14, 2017
Replies 3 3 Retweets 6 6 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter
Jim Puzzanghera
✔
@JimPuzzanghera
Net neutrality supporters left flowers in front of the FCC’s headquarters, contending the repeal of the online traffic rules will lead to the death of the internet as we know it.
4:02 PM - Dec 14, 2017
Replies 1 1 Retweet 2 2 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Former President Obama was a major advocate of net neutrality regulations, and the repeal is another step by Republicans to dismantle his legacy.
Obama was an early net neutrality supporter as a senator, and, in an unusual move for a president, injected himself directly into the FCC’s consideration of the regulations in 2014 by publicly urging the independent agency to install the utility-like oversight of telecom companies.
The FCC, then controlled by Democrats, approved the rules in early 2015 in a 3-2 vote.
Trump’s election last year switched the FCC majority to Republicans. Trump tapped Pai, a commissioner who was an outspoken opponent of the net neutrality rules, to be chairman.
Even before Pai was selected, he said he wanted to “fire up the weed whacker” to eliminate burdensome regulations and predicted that the net neutrality rules’ “days are numbered.”
If the net neutrality vote goes as anticipated, the fight will shift to Capitol Hill.
Supporters of the rules plan to urge Congress to halt the FCC’s repeal, a move unlikely to succeed with Republican majorities in the House and Senate. But there is bipartisan support for net neutrality, and some lawmakers want to pass net neutrality legislation that would enshrine some of the principles in law.
That would give the FCC the specific authority to enforce them without using utility-like oversight that some fear could lead to rate regulations and other burdensome regulations. Legislation also would end what both sides of the debate call a merry-go-round of different FCC approaches to the issue depending on which party controls the agency’s majority.
90 seconds: 4 stories you can't miss
CAPTION
90 seconds: 4 stories you can't miss
Disney acquires huge chunk of 21st Century Fox
90 seconds: 4 stories you can't miss
UPDATES:
7:20 a.m.: This article was updated with protesters rallying outside FCC headquarters.
This article originally was published at 6:30 a.m.
Disney buys much of Rupert Murdoch's 21st Century Fox in deal that will reshape Hollywood
Five more women accuse Russell Simmons of sexual misconduct across three decades
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2017, Los Angeles Times
Democratic Party Barack Obama Federal Communications Commission Republican Party Federal Trade Commission Donald Trump
Hi! I am a robot. I just upvoted you! I found similar content that readers might be interested in:
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-net-neutrality-fcc-20171214-story.html
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit