Congress Quietly Passed a Bill Allowing Warrantless Searches of Homes—Only 1% Opposed It

in news •  7 years ago 

A major red flag was buried in the text of a bill with a seemingly harmless title.

By Rachel Blevins - August 24, 2017



A bill that will allow homes to be searched without a warrant was passed with overwhelming support by the United States Congress, and signed into law by President Trump—and it happened with no media coverage and very little fanfare.

On the surface, House Joint Resolution 76 looks harmless. The title of the bill claims that its purpose is “Granting the consent and approval of Congress for the Commonwealth of Virginia, the State of Maryland, and the District of Columbia to enter into a compact relating to the establishment of the Washington Metrorail Safety Commission.”

“Whereas the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, an interstate compact agency of the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Virginia, and the State of Maryland, provides transportation services to millions of people each year, the safety of whom is paramount; Whereas an effective and safe Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority system is essential to the commerce and prosperity of the National Capital region; Whereas the Tri-State Oversight Committee, created by a memorandum of understanding amongst these 3 jurisdictions, has provided safety oversight of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.”

The proposal for a safety commission to act as a wing of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority may sound logical, when its power includes thing such as the ability to “Adopt, revise, and distribute a written State Safety Oversight Program” and to “Review, approve, oversee, and enforce the adoption and implementation of WMATA’s Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan.”

However, there is one major red flag buried within the text of the bill that stems from the list of “powers” given to the Washington Metrorail Safety Commission, and it violates one of the basic tenets of the U.S. Constitution.

“In performing its duties, the Commission, through its Board or designated employees or agents, may: Enter upon the WMATA Rail System and, upon reasonable notice and a finding by the chief executive officer that a need exists, upon any lands, waters, and premises adjacent to the WMATA Rail System, including, without limitation, property owned or occupied by the federal government, for the purpose of making inspections, investigations, examinations, and testing as the Commission may deem necessary to carry out the purposes of this MSC Compact, and such entry shall not be deemed a trespass.”
The text gives the Commission the authority to enter property near the Metro Rail System “without limitation” and without a warrant, for the purpose of “making inspections, investigations, examinations, and testing.”

This clearly goes against the Fourth Amendment, which states that Americans’ rights “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause.”

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I don't think it violates the Constitution, nor do I think it allows for warrantless searches of private domiciles.

They are referring to structures and/or land that is "adjacent" to the rail structure for purposes of safety. For instance, they could become aware of a terrorist attack plot involving planting explosives in a building or other structure that is directly adjacent to the rail structure in an effort to sabotage the rail system.

It would be necessary to act immediately on this type of intelligence and not wait for a warrant in order to save lives.

I'm not one to put my trust in the government, but I also don't see conspiracies and infringements on my rights where there simply aren't any.

Thanks for the nuanced clarifications.

Your just figuring out our government is corrupt? I hope not, its one hell of a big rock you have been living under for a long time. 80% of the country wants legal cannabis and its still a schedule 1 drug with NO MEDICAL BENEFITS...yet science and whole states have proved otherwise. Even the governments OWN cancer site says in lab studies its been proven effective in killing cancer cells.

Its all money, power and greed. The american people don't matter, or our Constitution and Bill of Rights.

I'm just sharing an article from the free thought project