I semi-trusted her but in the end she was as unreliable as any other lawyer, they will always care about there own interest, even if they are the strong part.
It is a long story so I cannot cover the whole story in this post. Late 2014 / early 2015, she was responsible for taken care of my interests and Angelo's interests in regard to the visitation of my son in my home. Elisabeth Ask Lundgren, suggested that we meet with Joanne and her lawyer outside the court room, before the latest court-meeting we had back around new year 2015. I accepted this, as I thought she would try to make an agreement between us without the judge, I saw it as a positive suggestion.
What happened was this: We sat there me and 3 woman, at a table outside the court room, We began the conversation. At first it was Joanne lawyer saying something, then I responded with what I suggest for Angelo's visitation, then I asked Joannes opinion. Joanne refused to talk, so her layer said something. Then my lawyer was talking, and the was clearly making fun of me, repeating something I said to her in our last meeting in a way, that was just bullying and not serious at all.
Then I sit there before an important meeting loosing all trust in my lawyer. Meeting with 3 woman against one man. I left, I told them that they where bad people and that my lawyer could send me a bill, then I left in rage!
My lawyer was kind of laughing at me and when she realized that I was leaving, she was calling me to stay like a lap dog. I just left. Then she ran after me and called me lauder and I responded with "go away home me".
This was a very traumatic day for me. I had already lost most confidence in the state, lawyers, banks and most other institutions, but this day was traumatic as it was about my son.
The 3 woman went to the court meeting without me and later I explained the court in email why I left. The judge decided that Angelo should still be with me 2 sundays a month. Even I wanted much ore, since it has been much more for all the years.
Letter for Elisabeth Ask Lundgren send today
Joanne have respected the agreement until November last year. So today I need to go back to court, and therefore I wrote Elisabeth Ask Lundgren, this letter:
"Til Elisabeth Ask Lundgren,
Nu har Joanne ikke overholdt aftalen om to søndage siden november 2016.
Derfor skriver jeg til dig, med tanke på vores omfattende samtaler over flere år og vores omfattende kendskab til hinanden, til Angelo og til sagen.
Det som skete ved vores sidste møde var meget uhensigtsmæssigt, jeg vil høre om du vil komme med en forklaring på hvorfor du gentog det som jeg havde sagt til dig, ved vores møde, på en nedværdigende måde da vi sad alle 4 udenfor retslokalet?
Jeg er villig til at tilgive denne dårlige adfærd, idet jeg mener at du er den bedste til at varetage Angelos interesser, idet du kender sagen. Herudover vil jeg sige at jeg har brugt meget tid på møder med dig og penge til retssystemet, derfor er det helt urimeligt at du bryder tilliden på den måde som du gjorde den dag!
Jeg kan ikke gå fra advokat til advokat, og det ved du også godt!
Derfor håber jeg at du vil gøre dit arbejde ordentligt og genoptage sagen med henblik på at få gennemført et samvær som er rimeligt, nu hver anden weekend, idet jeg ikke længere arbejder i weekend.
Du får jo høj betaling for dit arbejde, så man burde kunne forvente høj moral!
Jeg vil henvise til noget som du har fortalt mig, nemlig "at en forældre som holder barnet for sig selv, står meget dårligt i retten", dette har du sagt flere gange og derfor burde det være en let sag nu, at få samvær i det mindste, logisk set, hvis der da er nogen logik i retten og i advokat udtalelser??
Hvis du ikke ønsker at genoptage sagen, må jeg se det som en ekstremt aggressiv adfærd overfor mig og overfor min søn. Som jeg ikke på nogen måde har forståelse for, da jeg har overholdt vores aftaler og behandlet dig med respekt.
Afventer et hurtigt svar, da Angelo ikke har været hos mig siden november 2016.
Lasse Ehlers
Tilføjelse: Joanne har oplyst mig at hun flytter i en ny lejlighed i April 2017, men hun har ikke oplyst mig adressen og eller området. Jeg har spurgt omkring dette i mange måneder og hun nægter at svare. Jeg mener dette strider mod loven, idet jeg har læst at man skal oplyse den anden forældre i god tiden inden man flytter. Jeg husker det som 3 måneder inden, men er ikke sikker på denne del. I hvert fald har jeg brug for at denne sag bliver taget seriøst, hvis ikke du vil tage sagen, vil det gøre mig meget trist, da jeg så skal starte helt forfra med en ny advokat, det er helt urimeligt!"
Of course I don't expect Elisabeth to restore the client relation and then I am left with just accepting the situation as it is or contact a new lawyer for the 2. time. We all know that the system is completely corrupt, so I don't know if I want to waste more time talk with a new lawyer. Now Elisabeth at least is on the blockchain!
Steem on!
Lasse Ehlers
Copenhagen, Denmark
