How could this lead to famine? What's the most negative possible outcome, scientifically speaking? I couldn't deduce that from your link.
RE: Climate change “mad scientists” from Harvard
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Climate change “mad scientists” from Harvard
My personal view is that we/they have no right to try and play GOD and mess with Mother Nature.
EG - In Tasmania "they" "cultivated" the clouds with chemtrails even though heavy rain was expected or predicted. The end result was damaging flooding.
Messing with the sun is fraught with danger IMO. Sun, air and water needed to grow food - don't mess with it I say.
" a geoengineering experiment that will expel aerosols into the atmosphere to block out the sun "
"Gee, what could possibly go wrong? As I point out in this video, if a large volcano happens to blow at the same time, the massive amount of particulate matter ejected into the atmosphere by the eruption would cause global dimming. That result, combined with the Harvard “mad scientist” aerosol sun blocking effort, could lead to global food crop failures and FAMINE. Mass starvation, anyone? Meanwhile, the Yellowstone supervolcano has just experienced more than 1,000 small earthquakes, causing many people to wonder when it’s going to blow. (If it does blow, food crops will fail globally for 1-2 years, eliminating at least 90% of the current human population, by the way.)"
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah, if we had a large volcano incident, we'd definitely have issues. This would aggravate them.
I think we're in agreement, although I'd point out that one could argue man and all the materials he use are also a result of mother nature, and therefore anything we do is natural. Natural, of course, doesn't necessarily mean "good" in this context.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit