The Daily Economist's and Rogue Money Contributor Ken Schortgen Jr. joins "V" for a great discussion regarding China's move to establish gold as a reserve for oil trade, Ken's thoughts on cryptocurrencies and the future of blockchain technology.
We are political scientists, editorial engineers, and radio show developers drawn together by a shared vision of bringing Alternative news through digital mediums that evangelize our civil liberties.
Please subscribe for the latest shows daily!
http://www.roguemoney.net
https://www.facebook.com/ROGUEMONEY.NET/
https://twitter.com/theroguemoney
Holy Hell, that was more of a drive by shooting of Bitcoin than an interview. This "economist" has never investigated the other side of his bullets, which is ignorant or dishonest; either way unacceptable and ruinous to his credibility.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@way-truth-light, I actually enjoyed the discussion. I am pro-crypto, but I feel that Ken's points on (or against) Bitcoin were better than the average arguments which would usually state, "Bitcoin can't be money because it doesn't have a 5000 year history!" blah, blah blah... Sometimes it's good to hear points from the opposite side. Might've been a drive by shooting, but no kill shots were produced.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Problem is, he's flat out wrong because he is not reasoning from first principles, he operates on an agenda. His paycheck comment ignores the fact that Bitcoin goes down 8 decimal points, the lowest being a Satoshi. Our paychecks will say 250,000 Satoshis a week, not 0.025 Bitcoin. It's just so disingenuous and his credibility is shot. There are plenty of economists who have given Bitcoin a fair chance, ken has failed. The fact that he spends so much effort on it without ever having used it exposes him....
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit