I am not denying that some users exploit science tag to post bullshit or unrelated stuff, but your assumption about my blog is subjective and biased. Your comments can be potentially considered as spam. You have decided to go on this crusade and taking authority to do so without asking for opinion of science community here. You have not defined what content is exactly allowed for this tag.
You refer to steemcleaners work it has no official support from SC. Also SC have clear definitions of each abuse, and you lack any.
RE: Technology Newslink: Expert Predicts Bitcoin Will Be Worth Up To $20,000 In The Next Three Years 💻
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Technology Newslink: Expert Predicts Bitcoin Will Be Worth Up To $20,000 In The Next Three Years 💻
I simply state what I say, I leave it up to your discretion what posts are science, and what not and tag accordingly.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Please create clear definition of what content should be added to this tag and discuss it with science community here first
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit