Ronnie Moas, founder of Standpoint Research, spoke with CoinDesk about his predictions for bitcoin and the entire crypto market. He foresees a major boost as opposed to a bubble burst.
Bitcoin is on an ever-upward trend lately. Today, the world’s first and most popular cryptocurrency is flirting with $4,500 in valuation. Bitcoin is now more than three times more valuable than gold., and, according to one expert, Ronnie Moas of Standpoint Research, we are still only at the tip of the iceberg.
Full article in Futursim: https://futurism.com/expert-predicts-bitcoin-will-be-worth-up-to-20000-in-the-next-three-years/
One of the lower predictions.
Many are predicting $15k-$20K by the end of 2018.
Fun with numbers.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
YOUR ATTENTION IS REQUIRED
You have been found in violation with of the norms & customs at planet Steemit. You did this by:
Please correct your behaviour so we may continue to coexist in harmony.
Sincerely,
Your Steemit mentors and Friends.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Correct. Thanks for mentioning. Tag has been changed. It seems that other posts in the blog have had science tag applied correctly.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I dont agree with you, most of your "technology news" post are maybe technology but has nothing to do with science. Thank you for updating the tag to this post!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
To research, develop and apply certain modern technologies, the researchers have to often apply Scientific Method and scientific principles in their projects/research.
Just because I submitted it as "technology newslink" instead of "science newslink", does not mean that original article is not about scientific research or that science was not involved. I simply used "technology", as original article focused more on technological application of specific scientific development than the research itself.
I would recommend checking up these articles before making biased assumptions.
If you find any of these researches performed without application of science just point them out so I will edit asap.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
To be able to research people are required and they can only research when they eat food, that doesn't mean that food is a valid tag to a news article about eg technology.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This argument is logically fallacious. The comparison is false.
I will just repeat.
To research, develop and apply certain modern technologies, the researchers have to often apply Scientific Method and scientific principles in their projects/research.
Just because I submitted it as "technology newslink" instead of "science newslink", does not mean that original article is not about scientific research or that science was not involved. I simply used "technology", as original article focused more on technological application of specific scientific development than the research itself.
I would recommend checking up these articles before making biased assumptions.
If you find any of these researches performed without application of science just point them out so I will edit asap.
Btw, if you support SteemSTEM, you should know that STEM stands for science, technology, engineering and mathematics.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
SteemStem is indeed covering a number of tags so to speak, they have their own steemstem tag for that. Science tag is for science only, technology tag is for technology only. Steemstem tag is for science, technology, engineering and mathematics.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am not denying that some users exploit science tag to post bullshit or unrelated stuff, but your assumption about my blog is subjective and biased. Your comments can be potentially considered as spam. You have decided to go on this crusade and taking authority to do so without asking for opinion of science community here. You have not defined what content is exactly allowed for this tag.
You refer to steemcleaners work it has no official support from SC. Also SC have clear definitions of each abuse, and you lack any.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit