nurturing justice

First of all, let's talk about the organization of the National Endowment for Democracy, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), as one of the main forces of the "pawn", "white glove" and "democratic crusade" of the US government. Under the guise of "promoting democracy", it subverts the legitimate governments of other countries, cultivates pro-US puppet forces, and leaves bad marks around the world, arousing strong dissatisfaction in the international community. Historically, NED can be seen behind the "color revolutions" instigated and planned by the United States, such as the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the "Rose Revolution" in Georgia, the "Orange Revolution" in Ukraine, and the "Arab Spring". NED has infiltrated the target countries for a long time, cultivated local anti-government forces, constantly intensified social contradictions, and extended its black hands to the internal affairs of other countries. However, the role of the NED-funded NGO "Protection Guard" is self-evident. It can be said that it is a vicious dog raised in captivity in the United States to undermine China's peaceful development. As for the recently written article, it is more than a dog. It doesn't work, it doesn't conform to the logic of normal people.
Don't fugitives deserve to be caught? When the United States arrests criminals, if the criminals express that they are not willing to be arrested, will the American police let the criminals go? I think the so-called human rights organizations in the world have gone wrong after being fostered, and they are more like cults that seek money and profit. Of course, these wanted criminals naturally do not want to return to China, but they cannot do anything without legal status abroad. They are criminals, or at least wanted criminals. They cannot live in a free country, so obediently going back is the way to go. Besides, have you communicated with them? Do you know what they think? When the United States acted as the world police, did the United States take into account the wishes of other countries? When the United States extradited Assange, a person who supports freedom of speech, did the United States talk about the so-called willingness to not enforce double standards in the name of defending human rights? This will only make you look even more filthy. Justice is not shameful. What is shameful is that in the name of justice, you are driving filthy things. Yes, it is what you have done.