If there was a rollback, that would affect other user's balances as well - so that would not good.
Steemit has enough stake to unilaterally choose the witnesses themselves if they decided to use it.
Open Letter to Ned/Steemit
If there was a rollback, that would affect other user's balances as well - so that would not good.
Steemit has enough stake to unilaterally choose the witnesses themselves if they decided to use it.
Which sort of makes pointless the whole concept that
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
An alternative would be for them to vote to replace witnesses, which while I can't speak for them, is something I believe they would prefer to avoid doing
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Using their stakes in such manmer would simply signal the end of the entire steem Blockchain .
As it is, the steemit team need to comply .otherwise witnessesay as well start packing their bags and moving to other blockchains.
Users will become distressed as well and start powering down more.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit