I guess you know about the shake-up here at Steemit with the takeover. It's really important to vote for witnesses outside the top 20 in an effort to keep things decentralized. It may be a losing battle but we have try. Tell your friends
RE: Screwed Again: Britain's Version of Judge Amy Barrett-Jackson Assigned in Assange Case
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Screwed Again: Britain's Version of Judge Amy Barrett-Jackson Assigned in Assange Case
I saw the post by @ura-soul. Otherwise, I would not have known. I also resteemed his post. I won't miss the badies who votes were fake accounts but we have to keep the goodies. Especially those who work hard to make positive contributions. I think abusive and spamming witnesses need to be kicked off the list regardless. I also think witnesses need to be true platform members - active posting engaged members.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Most of the baddies (top 20) say "External Site" on the right hand side- with a few exceptions.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oh okay. Got ya.
I will not vote for people like blow hole bully though. Abusers of the platform should not be witnesses in my opinion. Filling the chain with spam and so on. Nope.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't know blow hole bully unless you mean bernie, he's the only one I can think of that fits the bill
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yup.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit