Blockchain or BitLattice as a political party

Pseudonym Pairs (https://panarchy.app/PseudonymPairs.pdf) as a new proof-of-person, a personhood system, makes it possible to go from a Nakamoto consensus that votes with CPU (Wright, 2009), and vote used in some sense metaphorically, to one that votes with people-vote, a proof-of-vote. This third generation of the Nakamoto consensus (the second being proof-of-stake) is a very natural evolution of what Craig Wright started a decade ago. There are traditionally platforms that are selected for using suffrage (proof-of-suffrage), political parties. In the case of permissionless global ledgers, as perfectly neutral arbitrators, they would be equivalent to a political party that provides a platform with competing legal systems (permissionless), and from that a free market for government, what Paul Emile de Puydt called Panarchy (Revue Trimestrielle, 1860), something an "analog" political party could never provide because of human bias.