Mental Health and the Motive

It blows my mind. That in this day and age people would honestly throw out all forms of science, and reasoning to believe what their glowing mirrors tell them. There are some other angles we need to press together on others and not let them get away with ignoring the facts when it comes to these shootings and mass killings. See the thing is a well informed truther can best the mind of any idiot. Today we are gonna look at and talk about another side to the Mental Health of our so called "school shooters" and "mass killing" scenarios. I think others are doing a great job pointing out the side of Prescription drugs and the deadly side effects that can put one into a deep state of psychosis. But I want to look at the other side, the brain and the development of growth in the brain. If certain areas of the brain do not develop correctly, the over all behavior of an individual would be different for someone who had those areas develop. No motive killings that take place in a short time at one general location would state that the individual was psychopathic.

The areas of the brain we are concerned with today are the Prefrontal Cortex and the Amiglia. Many different things can factor in the end result of an individuals brain development: Nutrients, Environment, Mental Stimulation, Physical activity, interpersonal relationships, and genetics . The media will try to lead people away from this topic as they are doing with Nicholas Cruz, planting garbage that this was for fame or other things. (recent article of his brother talking about how Nick is now known by so many girls , and I still dont understand how these two are communicating)http://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/accused-mass-murderer-nikolas-cruz-arrested-brother-starting/story?id=53887073 IF we hold the media and the police, the fbi accountable for their negligence of letting this happen. (I personally dont know what to think of this cause everything about the parkland shooting is terribly put together, edited, and no substantial evidence to back up any claims by the mainstream media. Let us not forget they jumped to pointing the finger, blaming the other aka gun owners. And starting a manipulation campaign to use our children as props for their propaganda)

So lets dive into our brains, as this will arm you with so much more knowledge on not only seeing the lines they blend to create their narrative, but how many of the current "stories" do not add up in a clinical sense. You don't just snap over night and become a psychopathic killer. Drugs can do this, but we never hear from the media if they tested for substances in the individuals bodies (they don't want the blame centered around a substance or the gun control debate goes right out the door). What would turn someone who is not exposed to these substances mentally deranged? The reason I ask this, is I am going to tie in some things most of you learned recently with pizza gate and child abuse.

Let's dive into the the brain. The areas I am concerned with today are going to be the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala. The prefrontal cortex deals with executive functions meaning this area of the brain deals primarily with abilities to differentiate among conflicting thoughts, determine good and bad, future consequences of current activities, working toward a defined goal, prediction of outcomes, expectation based on actions, and social "control" (the ability to suppress urges that, if not suppressed, could lead to socially unacceptable outcomes). Where as the Amygdala primary role is to process information and memories, decision making and emotional response. Both pictured down below:

In the beginning we didn't think to much of our brain being the center house for controlling our thoughts. It was not till the tragic accident Phineas Gage that we had any evidence of this. Pineas was working on building the railroad and and had a rod blow through is skull. To the amazement of all the people around Phineas survived. Many scientist of the time were very confused that he was still functioning, well, to some what of an extent. While his motor skills were not impacted, Phineas's behavior changed greatly after the rod had gone through his brain. He went from being a calm rational man to being very aggressive at times and erratic. While we did not have the technology in the past, several attempts were made to build 3d models so as to figure out what parts of the brain were damaged. Although this is heavily still debated, one thing was made clear from this, the brain not working in tangent with itself can abruptly change ones behavior and thinking patterns.

So now that we can see demonstrate how a healthy brain being tampered by brain damage can change the over all out come of our behavior we need to look at the development of these areas, and what stops these areas of the brain from developing correctly. We are going to look into children this time. What environmental and social conditions will make an innocent child turn to ravage killing. There are plenty of cases to pull from, but we will focus on the murder of James Bulger 1993. James Bulger was 2 years old, his murders were both age 10. It was one of the most heart breaking cases of its time. Why would two 10 year old boys attack a random child? At first even the general public had no regard for caring or finding out the reasoning behind these boys, they only wanted to destroy them, paint them as evil (and yes what they did was pure malice and evil no debate there) however its really important to understand how these boys got to this point so that in the future we may prevent more circumstances that could lead one to the route of psychopathic killing.

Here is an article going into the two young murders: https://childhoodtraumarecovery.com/2014/03/26/when-ten-year-olds-turn-killers-the-case-of-jon-venables-and-robert-thompson/ It brings to light the nurture vs nature debate. The one thing that is most common in psychopathic killings is their upbringing. When a child is not held, or given a loving environment the brain stops releasing opiates. Opiates are one of the major factors in the development of the prefrontal cortex. If this area does not function properly, erratic behavior becomes present. The individual looses control of their thoughts and can not control their thoughts like that of a person who did have the factors present for the brain to develop correctly. In such cases, this would imply that those involved in the upbringing would also be just as much part of he reason why their own child would act out. The media will not go into this as this completely helps throw out the debate if a tool was the reason why someone would commit an act of murder. I want to also state, that until recent years this was a very uncommon form of murder. The most common murders today are those of personal type. Meaning there is a motive behind their actions.

This also brings up why all the killers are always on some psychotropic drug. If they are already experiencing mental anguish, this would bring to question their upbringing. What I question is the rate of these, and if these so called shootings and mass murders are not a hoax, we simply need to look past the tools used and understand the over all thinking process of the individual and their brain development. It think it is rather important, that before we set these trials into place, brain scans and other tools should be used to make sure the individual was either acting upon past regressions, psychotropic drug use, or if they were a broken soul from their upbringing. Its not question of what the murder's tool was, but why they did the actions they did. To rope a general populist into one conclusion is wrong, and not very brilliant of us for being at such a technological state.