If you were listening to @pennsif State of Steem show on MSP Waves yesterday, you might've heard a lot of talk about committees. I would like to extrapolate on this initiative.
(If you went MIA yesterday, you can listen to the whole discussion right here)
What Can/Should Committees Acomplish?
Whether it's a curation committee, an anti abuse one, or even a group of prominent Steemians trying to increase demand for our beloved token. A few issues arise on how to actually operate in that framework
1: how to make it the most efficient process (low time consuming)
And
2: and an effective one (best solutions found)
Now Several Questions Arise
a1: who is allowed in to the committee?
a2: usually the more people participate in a discussion, the lower is the quality of said discussion. If anyone is allowed in a committee, spam and pointless arguments are unavoidable.
But on the flip side, a lower number of participants may result in a small pool of ideas and solutions. A proper trade-off has to be made between this pro-con couple.
a3: a poosible trade-off configuration can be the following: a select few (5-7 Steemians) will hold private discussions & brainstorming, and will host an MSP Waves show, presenting their conclusions while having a discussion with a wider audience about said conclusions.
a4: for greater utilisation of Wisdom of the Crowds, the committe should have internal discussions about any post containing the relevant hashtag (e.g #CurationCommitteePost). This way innovative and profound ideas will penetrate the committee's bubble early on, and not only on the radio show (or at all).
Who's The Boss?
b1: who is in charge of forming and administrating the committees?
b2: that is probably the toughest decision we have to make in relation to the wider Steem community. Who the hell has the authority to make such a centralised decision?!
b3: a measurable criteria needs to chosen, for, hopefully, a fair authority recognition by the wider Steem audience.
b4: it can the X witnesses having to vote on who should manage each committe. Or the top x SP holders. Or even letting the founders of various Steem Apps to chose the leaders that should lead the problem solving effort of all the obstacles Steem is facing on its way to the moon.
A Committee Has More Than One Head
c1: say the administrator is chosen, what's next? Who will be the other 4-6 committee members?
c2: an idea that was proposed was to let each relevant community to send a representative to the committe. For instance in a curation committee every community that is focused in fairly distributing the reward pool (via upvotes) , let's say the 7 largest (most members/posts/SP stake/other) relevant community leaders will form the committee.
c3: a different option is to let the x top of y (witnesses/SP holders/Steem apps founders) chose the rest of the committee members as well.
What Is My Authoritah?
d1: OK, so have a bunch of ideas. Now what?
d2: whales, top 20 witnesses and non witness developers need to decide which resources should be dedicated to implementing those solutions. Either via voting power (positive if for work proposal, curation, etc'. Negative for fighting abuse), protocol modifications (to dedicate which portion of the reward pool will go to fund worker proposals) and pro-bono(ish) development to make the protocol changes, and associated tools that the committees think are necessary to better achieve their goals.
I Think I've Bored You Enough
To conclude, authority and formation of the committees need to be carefully decided by us Steemians. Please give your 2 cents (or even a dime) in the comments. There might be better ways to do this than what's written in this post, so any feedback and follow-up questions are much appreciated.
One final thought: I think that all the committees should present their conclusions + have the wider discussion on the same day on MSP Waves.
i.e
13:00-14:00 Steem Apps Committee Presentation
14:05-15:05 Abuse Fighting Committee Presentation
15:10-16:10 Curation Committee Presentation
16:15-17:15 Worker Proposals Committee Presentation
etc'
etc'
Come on! There needs to be a STEEM flag on the MOON! Where's our rocketship?!
Posted using Partiko Android
awesome idea on to have representatives from various steem communities coming together to discuss and get things done for steem.
PS :
Posting content on instagram ? give share2steem a look. It’s a new dapp that EASILY autopost your instagram post to steemit. Get daily upvotes from s2s and other users who activate unique double curations.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you so much for participating the Partiko Delegation Plan Round 1! We really appreciate your support! As part of the delegation benefits, we just gave you a 3.00% upvote! Together, let’s change the world!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for taking the initiative and writing this post!
I'd be glad to be part of the Steem Apps & Worker Proposal committee.
Could you create one or multiple suggestions about committees on https://steem.nolt.io/ as well? So we'd have a central place to save all of our ideas for Steem.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
keep up the good work, it must be frustrating at times, but no one knows when a big breakthru idea may be imminent... at least more people are coming to the table to get shit done.
holiday peace
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has been included in today's SOS Daily News - a digest of all you need to know about the State of Steem.
Promoter of The SOS Forums : Weekly Discussion Forums on the State of Steem.
Co-ordinator of SteemClub-UK.
Editor of the weekly listing of steem radio shows, podcasts & social broadcasts.
Founder of the A Dollar A Day charitable giving project.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit