Sir, excuse me, but I will give my honest opinion, this is not about having users with scores between 9 and 10 grouped together, the problem that is occurring is that students get upset when they are not selected, and we are seeing this in different courses, yes They evaluate themselves with a score less than 10, they get upset because they immediately think that they are not going to win, and if they evaluate themselves with a 9-10 and they are not selected, they also get upset because they believe that upon receiving that score they will be selected among the winners, they try not to. Learning is what it seems to me but receiving a vote, and I could understand but what I cannot understand is that they want to be selected at any cost because otherwise they complain by putting our work in between.
But if the problem is due to the score, we will be carrying out a more strict evaluation to avoid inconveniences.
As mentioned in the @stemmitblog post...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Teachers need to focus on making their course not too difficult and as many people as possible can join it. If the course is difficult then very few people will participate in it. It is also important to ensure that grades are given honestly and not with favoritism.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If you design your courses and your grading to give a wider spread of grades you won't have the problem so much.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit