7 days is too long to wait for rewards on a social media site.
Regular users want instant gratification. They want to do something and then get rewarded as quickly as reasonably possible.
Average users don't even remember what they posted on social media a week ago.
24 hour payout feels like social media vs. 7 day payout feels like a job (no one likes jobs)
Money should be moving faster not slower in the crypto economy.
Daily payouts open up a whole new world of business possibilities that can operate on a daily basis. Cryptocurrencies make it possible for people to be paid faster and more regularly.
24 hour payouts are a major feature of this new economy!
Gamification principal
24 hour payout window:
Post something. Get paid.
Post something. Get paid.
Post something. Get paid.
Post something. Get paid.
(Action. Followed by a reward which is obviously connected to that action. Users can then use that information instantly to improve their next post)
7 day payout window:
Post something. Wait.
Post something. Forget about it.
Post something. Wait.
Post something. Forget about it.
Get paid for something you forgot about.
Get paid for something you forgot about.
Get paid for something you forgot about.
Get paid for something you forgot about.
But people will make a little bit more money if it's 7 days.
Regular users are not concerned about maximizing profits. They just want to know that they've received money in their wallet.
"A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush". Users don't want their money in limbo for a whole week. They don't want 7 days of fear that their $40 pending payout is going to get flagged down to $20 on the last day.
Almost all votes are cast well within 24 hours. Why should we extend the timeframe 7x to accommodate for probably less than 0.10x more rewards.
7 days isn't new-user-friendly.
With a 24 hour payout period, new users can grasp, experience, and demo the full concept of Steemit in a couple days. If the payout is changed to 7 days then it will take more than a week for a new user to really experience how Steemit works (from post to payout).
"Come back next week sometime and we'll teach you how to use your wallet".
But isn't one payout period "simpler"??? even if it's longer?
Actually, length of time can make something more complicated. It's a lot more simple to keep track of something for one day than to keep track of a bunch of different things over the course of seven days.
Disclaimer:
I'm not saying I am right or that I have all the information. This is just my opinion right now based on the information that I have been exposed to. I also realize that there may be a bunch of undisclosed good reasons for changing to the 7 day payout period... I hope there are. But I really am scared that changing to 7 days is a major step in the wrong direction. If I'm missing something... please let me know!
yep i also dont like that. 24h should stay, just 2nd payment could be 7 days not 30
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You make a lot of salient points here.
I wrote a very long post weeks ago here about my reply to @dan / @dantheman one night. Weeks later, I decided to make it a post about not doing away with rewards and month, or a year later and tied it to my philosophy of us being writers, like a book deal would see.
That was my main point but I elaborated. I think both can be easily done.
Would (name your top author here) be happy about their work not being rewarded years later and be ok with payments stopped on their content creation?
have a good week man
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Here is the post actually, I consider it some of my best work, IMHO.
https://steemit.com/steemit/@barrydutton/re-changes-to-not-reward-steemit-posts-authors-after-30-days-etc-i-disagree-and-here-s-why
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Personally I think we've just got used to the 24 hours and had it started out as 7 days we'd have no problem with it. It would mean curators don't have to be online every day to maximise the use of their votes.
My main issue with it however is the fixed period. I see no reason to remove what we have to protect us from last minute votes. The payout could easily range from 5-7 days.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We'll always be more used to what we're used to. I'm usually in favour of more change and experimenting not less. But in this case, if we had started with a 7 day payout I can almost guarantee that I would be in favour of changing it to 24 hours now.
It might make things a little easier for curators to maximize their votes... But for me that doesn't outweigh all the advantage of a 24 hour payout period.
I'm willing to be convinced... just haven't been yet.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You feel me! I likes and dislikes the idea. It's great in a sense that it will force me to hold on to my liquid STEEM f0r a bit before I make any bad decisions 4example, the other day I took out my liquid STEEM & the price shot up to $0.30 and this is after purchasing/reward-gaining @the price 0f $0.07 :(
The negative aspect of this is that say you want to be rewarded when the price is @a low but then you are rewarded when the price is higher. Not good! So I am curious to how this will play out. We shall see! Changes I tell ye! That's life right! Have to be able 0r willing to adapt if you wanna survive ;)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yip, I'll totally accept the change if that's the way it goes! After all, we are still experimenting. But I just thought I'd let the community know that I really don't understand how the benefits of a 7 day payout outweigh these concerns. But I guess we'll see.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I like your points as well. Good in-depth response for the community - Resteemed ;)
And what is the purpose really of this change as we already have S.P. locked up, isn't this enough? Makes no sense unless someone here can make sense of it - Cough@Ned ?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
0h! and the point you make about new users to sample the platform, not having to wait so long to see if they can dig it!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit