Don't you know how much you could get for one PPY?
Thanks.
RE: Peerplays Blockchain Distributes First Rakes to Stakeholders
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Peerplays Blockchain Distributes First Rakes to Stakeholders
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you only held one PPY during these 30 days, then your allocation would have been zero PPY due to your portion of the stake being smaller than the minimum precision that can be measured by the blockchain. Note that the first DApp, Helmbet, was not using the main network until the 7th day of the 30 days, so the amounts played were small.
Alternatively, if you held one PPY and the amount played were large enough then you would have received enough to exceed the minimum of 0.00001 PPY. There is no single answer unless you assume a few things.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you Taco!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Do you know the minimum about of PPY needed to have obtained a payout (ie to meet the 0.00001 PPY minimum) for November?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The short answer is, "No." There is no single answer to this question because it also depends on how much rake was collected during any hour. A larger rake will require a smaller amount to be held by a stakeholder to meet the minimum. I will try to think of a good way to answer your question in the future.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit