He calls the speed of light "scientific dogma"
first the speed of light is variable, it is not constant. So the equation is wrong. RIP EINSTEIN DOGMA
Speed of light not so constant after all | Science News
Even in vacuum conditions, light can move slower than its maximum speed depending on the structure of its pulses. a possibility that could have broad implications for fields of cosmology and even astronomy https://www.sciencenews.org/article/speed-light-not-so-constant-after-all
No scientist says the speed of light is constant. Science says the speed of light travelling through a vacuum is 299,792,458 m / s.
Sheldrake seems to use the word dogma with this standard definition: a point of view or tenet put forth as authoritative without adequate grounds.
So Sheldrake says scientists simple accept what authoritative scientists tell them about the speed of light without testing it themselves. When in fact, scientists continually test and retest the speed of light under a myriad of conditions. The speed of light is not dogma, it is a rigorously tested and verified fact.
As to the universe having "memory" and "consciousness", please! You would have to provide some PROOF of these claims. Not unsupported proclamations from new age, post modern gurus. Claiming something is true is quite different from proving something is true.
And finally epigenetics. Yes, it is real. So what? One example: adults that were prenatally exposed to famine conditions have also been reported to have significantly higher incidence of schizophrenia.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
space is not a vacuum, and this implies that einstein calculations are false because for many decades the speed of light has remained constant in all academic equations... much of what is known must be rewritten. Hence a possibility that could have broad implications for fields of cosmology and even astronomy.
again, you didnt watch Bruce lipton enough... you are so deadly mainstream. Sheldrake is correct and so is bruce lipton, and the like. Otherwise you'd know that the thoughts can override genes' expression.
that is what I was saying, you are an atheist, regardless of what you may claim... life came out of the nothing... do you have a proof? :)
Every cell and subparticle behaves the way it is programmed for. And this program is embedded in the fabric of the universe, and called Consciousness. The Universe is alive and functions according the memory of this program. How difficult is it to grasp that? Only a stubborn atheist cannot.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sheldrake is not correct. He is lying. He is wrong. I explained HOW he was wrong.
You are just renaming physical laws as "memory" and "program" and "consciousness". That doesn't accomplish anything.
I don't know where life originally came from, and neither do you.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
And about Einstein's equations being wrong...lolz
The speed of light in a vacuum IS the constant. This number: 299 792 458 m / s is the constant used in equations. Not the speed of light in atmosphere, not the speed of light through water, not the speed of light through space, but the speed of light in vacuum. I know it is hard for you to think in a logical manner, but at least try once in awhile.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit