I am talking about a system of equal distribution. If everyone had capital that averaged 1 million dollars then the products, land, cars and everything else will be averaged based on that amount. There wouldn't be a measure for actual price other than the one set by the seller/buyer. Stock exchanges set prices based on the difference of value. If every single stock traded a million it would be hard to sell one to buy another. Everything will be around that 1 initial 1 million.
RE: Crypto-tragedy: “Now I am a believer” or history repeats itself
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Crypto-tragedy: “Now I am a believer” or history repeats itself
No one is suggesting that every THING of value be forced to be equal. Things differ in value to different people, hence allowing for mutually beneficial exchange. You're shifting the example to be something ridiculous and then arguing against that. People having equal amounts of wealth does not inhibit the economy. That's the argument you contended against to begin with here.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
People having equal amounts of wealth destroys the economy. Every time it happened it collapse. aka communism.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit