When quality is not the main thing in a photo ...

in photo •  8 years ago  (edited)

Have you watched family photos for a long time? I am sure that most of us look at them occasionally, or on holidays with friends and relatives, but if they are scanned and placed in a home media center or on a computer, the viewing will be more touching and exciting, because everyone can watch at the same time. Having surpassed all the paper photo in the figure, and grouping them by their semantic content, you can quickly find the photo you want to see, and I assure you that it's nice to see an old photo of the format 9 by 12, enlarged on the monitor or TV screen, in a sufficiently good resolution. In addition, over time, the photo fades more and loses its original appearance, so the only way to save them is digitization. For me this process is already in the past, there is no need to get a few albums each time and hand them over (though for someone it's the charm to remember the past). Photos specifically for reasons of preservation of historical value were not subjected to any processing in photo editors, except for trimming white (rather gray) fields. On one of the most relevant for men (and not only) and post the retro-photo.
I wish you all a pleasant viewing!













P.S. I admit fishing only for bait and spinning, no networks, etc. The photo was taken at "Smena-8m" and "Agate 18k" cameras.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I like when I go through old photos and nostalgia hits me right in the face.

Thanks, me too.