Woow, real "action" photo :D
Yes, in reverse lensen depth of field is really shallow, I tried this as well with standard 55mm lens, It is good in artistic or abstract shooting of plants or other details but extremely hard to handle when shooting living, fast moving, 3D creatures ;). Thank You for comment!
RE: My PhotoVisions #23 - My Macro Worlds vol.1
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
My PhotoVisions #23 - My Macro Worlds vol.1
You're welcome. I haven't tried the reverse-mount macro stuff in a long time. Kind of like trying to use a hand-held microscope to take pictures. I've had the same issue with difficulty of proper focus and decent depth of field no matter which various method I've tried. I'm always amazed by these nature shows that show macro insect shots with complete depth of field of the entire insect when I could barely get one eye in proper focus with depth. : )
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The pictures about You are saying now are made using method called focus stacking - You are doing a serie of photos with different focal points and than, using some software like photoshop, You merge all the frames in one which has full focus spectrum. This needs time and some experience but the results are great... Other thing is that this kind of focus stacking images are not made in the real nature but in studio - and the insects are not moving...because they are dead :(.
But using the proper proffesional macro lenses will also gives You much better DOF without catching the insects or spending hours in processing works...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit