idiot.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!

Sort Order:

Trending

apsu (65) · 7 years ago

Yes, yes you are.

$0.10

baah (61) · 7 years ago

Yeah somehow we stopped talking about Monopolizing, as in to have exclusive control over making money from an idea. Nobody is doing that though Right? Fail you

IDIOT

$0.00

apsu (65) · 7 years ago

I never even started to talk about that. You did and you keep on claiming I did.

You're sad. Claiming I'm an idiot won't make me one.

baah (61) · 7 years ago

Nobody is trying to monopolize art. The typical wish is at least that the art created by them is not used for commercial use without a permission.

AKA Monopolizing ideas. Idiot.

$0.00

apsu (65) · 7 years ago

No it's not.

baah (61) · 7 years ago

Actually using a State Granted Monopoly to have exclusive control over ideas and monetizing them is what I mean when I say monopolizing, and what the definition of monopolizing means in the context of exclusive control over profiting from ideas. Denying that exclusive control isn't monopolizing on ideas is denying the very definition of the word monopolizing and the very function by which copyright works.

$0.00

baah (61) · 7 years ago

If I would create a piece of art and you'd just use my art in attempt to make money for yourself, I would try to stop you with the tools I have. And you of course could go crying "BOO HOO YOU ARE TRYING TO MONOPOLIZE ART"

Trying to use the State Granted Monopoly to Monopolize on people making money off ideas that you claim as exclusive to yourself is immoral and it has no semblance of a basis in logic. To deny that you were talking about State Granted Monopoly to Monopolize on making money off art is counter to any sense attached to the words above. That quote above is definitive proof that you were talking about what I was talking about: monopolizing on ideas, I don't need to Claim anything, it's Evident to all who have the slightest sense. How was that challange again? Idiot.

$0.00

apsu (65) · 7 years ago

No it's not.

baah (61) · 7 years ago

$0.00

baah (61) · 7 years ago

Nobody is talking about monopolizing art

@tamwin33

There is no such thing as intellectual property. It's a state granted monopoly over an intellectual domain. It's property in the same way people used to be property in that it doesn't make any philosophical or logical sense for society.

So that person is another Nobody?

$0.00

baah (61) · 7 years ago

$0.00

Reveal Comment

apsu (65) · 7 years ago

Wow, this is just plain sad.

Nope and nope.

baah (61) · 7 years ago

Nope what Idiot, cannot form a proper sentence and explain what you're denying and why? "I'm not an idiot simply because you say so" No need, you are as you act.

Nope and nope, "Plain sad", Ok.

$0.00