I suggest not digging on topics not pertinent to Tesla research. While I endorse the recreation of Wardenclyffe and the underpinning theory, as an astronomy enthusiast and owner of a big telescope I totally disagree on this post, because it sports an absolutely disgraceful position about the moon rotation, and I'm not even arguing about the "PROOF" presented here. Please... things like this can destroy credibility on the other things you are researching, Ernst!
RE: Famous Scientific Illusions - the Moon's Rotation
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Famous Scientific Illusions - the Moon's Rotation