There isn't such a thing a superhumanly good just as there isn't it's opposite. That concept seeks to paint one as more than and it's not getting anywhere since no universal moral maxim exists, and then even if everyone can be judged on and in consistency with everyone else, the act itself isn't proactive in the least, it's merit is clearly questionable. These judgements are stemming from reaction and emotion and belief and not logic.

Saying "for me in my thoughts and experiences" isn't inviting conversation, especially when your thoughts and experiences are tied to a myth and that myth is the basis for what you say as the opposite of most evil. One step further, the meme of me and my experiences is hardly non reactive, the stance of mitigating discussion in the corner of "subjective" vs "objective" is your choice. The implication of "for me in my thoughts and experiences" aside and putting wrongs and evil aside, granted this discussion is about pointing fingers, pegging blame, and that is not to dismiss it what so ever. The reality is that there's these people out there and that yes they could be called landlords of the planet, in fact to the rest of the universe for all we know these people, not "beings", are probably flesh and blood feeling thinking conscious ambassadors to different worlds simply because of an almost unfathomable amount of influence. Sacrificing infants, eating infants, injecting infant blood to stay younger, fucking and killing kids, hunting kids, murdering anyone who stands in their way, erasing those who dare to expose them, just the number of microbiologists that have died since 9/11 is outrageously high, and that's because these people have a hammer and they use it, they use it in our language, and so in turn on our mind, our thinking faculty.
So then.. Why are we so afraid of even looking at the depravity? What is it that scares us when we look at that depravity that we disconnect these people, these human beings and paint them as something other than a hairless monkey? Be it they have far more complex and incredibly specific functions or purposes than to have a family and all that, they too are simply doing monkey, can you say that they know what they are doing? Hell no, you will eat your words as soon as you open your mouth and say that. I am not saying to excuse their actions and responsibility for those acts. Their action's direct consequences, those which form their needs, but primarily for the need to be private and covering up their deeds at all cost is what we are seeing now. It is a simple mathematical equation describing exponential increase, could there be a reality where truth doesn't come to light? Where deceit and ignorance are all pervasive?
But first, what warrants this other worldly status of super and what is it communicating? What makes people reactive is either intended to or not and so it bears on this situation as it plays into their hands. Can people converse much in a situation precipitating with emotion of fear or one where fantasy is purported as reality?
Fear vs love is flawed because you put fear as opposite to love and said, fear is nowhere near love, cast it out. Maybe you are the director of these "emotions", but outside the idea of "control" there is attention and focus. Yes, completely unhindered about "should" and "could" and very much empty of all other concepts. Focusing and becoming aware of my emotions is about all I can do, once you start directing what you should feel you have opened yourself to suffering what you shouldn't feel. So then ,the moment you lose control, the moment fear has seeped in, there isn't anything but a reaction to repress that because of a certain "feels" which goes contrary to common sense. With that idea of should/could, you would need to pay attention and then cast out fear and replace it with love, and that is how you want to benefit, the value you gained from that is not just a better ability at turning fear into love, but you didn't let those fears wreak havoc on your consciousness..
Somewhere in that idea lies a lesson about the wisdom of detachment, misconstrued as it is. What about the maxim of embrace your demons, welcome and treat your fear like a guest?LINK Do I think these child molesting baby eating individuals have demons and they are embracing them in the form of baby eating child sex? Maybe they embraced their demons and that led them to those actions? Their demons probably stem from the consequences of being so private or in others case of being found out, and their freedom lies then in embracing a more open life I think, the freedom from their demons is not running away from their demons, demonising these people isn't going to bring justice, isn't going to mitigate some anger, isn't going to help, their actions have repercussions and they are responsible for those consequences. The question is, what to do again, and all you can do is voice your concerns, spread the information, don't succumb to labeling ideas, situations or people as negative and let a certain fear of contamination direct what you can't look at, what you can't research, and ultimately what you can't understand. There's plenty of questions to be asked. How you choose your direction, are you inviting conversation by being specific, by being grounded in reality and not myth? As uninviting as I come off, it's up to you to question and understand in a manner that invites and doesn't provoke, or evoke sentiments but thoughts.