Many data points are correct & detail driven. I'm always amazed @ the outright dismissal and linguistic twisting utilized in confronting "conspiricy". Americans have been linguisticly programmed, that "conspiricy theory" is an outright delusion bordering on requiring mental health intervention. Hence, critical analysis of content when not precisely set in fimiliar context, is dismissed as pure madness.
Although the series of articles cited are full of factual points in relevant "conspiracy truth", the flow in context is lacking, therefore mistakenly, "categorically dismissed".
While this article is slanted by an implied agenda, much context & content is worthy of reflective thought and further research, rather then outright dismissal .
I applaud this article for taking, theoretical foundation opening a discussion which requires voluminous historical rethinking and volumes of fact based details for the casual readers interest.
For this reader, it was a refreshing authentic viewpoint worthy of reading. Perhaps one for the more geopolitically informed and those no longer beholden or fearful of their linguistic programming.
Worth a read, reflection and put it into your own context of your reality?
Thank You!