The dialogue can´t fail to be sincerely, so the one who proposes a bridge. This its ver important for the philosophy and in general for the persons.
It is because it is very differentiated from the beginning of the concept or of the exclusionary imposed category of what is not the beginning, so if we are only welcoming with we think is nice we will be unable to reconcile things for a greater and common good; because the interests are those "bronze souls" as Plato called the merchants or souls other than the guardians and the philosopher-king who were silver and gold, respectively, in front of a sincere search for the Truth and the most essential Eidos so as not to get lost in earthly and empty struggles of the greatest dimension.
So, the divine isn´t the “homo mensura” of Protagoras. that is invalidated by the Deus Mensura Platonic of in the Laws, because the old Plato and above all wise his already revised his own theories but only at the end of his days the great and colossal thinker of which many things we attribute but are more those that we must end up unknowing in dimensions superior to those of the mortal on foot ... we do not possess those shines of the luminaries of superiors and we do the echo that Schopenauer attributes to the Platonic quotation: of the bastards as responsible for agonizing the more beautiful of things the city-state relationship and the discredit of Philosophy as that bastard who is no longer lover because it is not of the Sage but of the seeker to know that philosopher, that value beyond possessing and not seeking ... because we walk without reaching the goal ... we aspire, we elevate things because they are not elusive and far from all practical and factual earthiness ...
The intelectually people give differents and differents categories but own can said finally, the superior activity demands the best time and dedication for its.
