not yet it seems^^
let me know when you have the changes pushed to master, then I'll upgrade mine asap.
RE: POCKET Day 7: Over a billion tokens claimed!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
POCKET Day 7: Over a billion tokens claimed!
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
To keep the voting code simple and avoid voting too much, I'm having it vote only for ones that earned the fee. But it looks like it's working; it's voted for several of your confirms. I've got my updated code in the develop branch; it's what I have running now so you're welcome to give it a shot if you like. I'm going to keep running it for a little while before I merge it into master.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think it's a great idea to prevent unnecessary spamming of confirmation messages. I'll give it a try.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sorry if you've covered this elsewhere, but will there always be multiple confirmations for these transactions? If several confirmation bots are competing for the same fee, is there no mechanism for preventing this? If so, is the mechanism on the blockchain?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Competition and network lag will probably often lead to multiple confirmations. Only the first account gets the fee, though.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ah right, that's a shame, but I can't think of any way round it either at the moment. Great idea though!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit