Puddle Duck and Puzzle Duck

in poetry •  7 years ago 

PuzzleDuckAndPuddleDuck-Color.png

Puddle Duck and Puzzle Duck went out for a walk.
Said Puzzle Duck to Puddle Duck, “We should have a talk.
Because you enjoy it so, we go out in the rain,
But then I do not get a chance to exercise my brain.”

“But Puzzle Duck,” said Puddle Duck, “I do not know why
You'd want to be inside the house, fun's falling from the sky!
Surely I would like a game that we could play together,
But I can only splish and splash out in the rainy weather.”

Said Puzzle Duck to Puddle Duck “It is a mystery
Why some things that are fun for you just are not fun for me.”
“I do not know the answer,” said Puddle Duck, for sure.
“Why don't you think it over while I splash about some more?”


This post is a confluence of a lot of things I've been interested in lately: trying to practice and improve my drawing skills, poetry, and the philosophy of games. I saw @opheliafu's posting for Doodle Doodledayeo Round 14 this morning and immediately knew what I wanted to do for it. The inspiration words are Rain / Duck / Umbrella. I live in the Pacific Northwest of the US, a region that it strongly associated with rain. More specifically, I live in Eugene, Oregon, and ducks are kind of big thing here – the University of Oregon's sports teams are The Ducks, for example. I like to take long walks every morning for exercise, and on both my normal medium-length route and one of my alternate long routes I pass some duck-themed public art (I took a hybrid route today so I could snap pics of both):

DuckPublicArt.png

Taking those long walks gives me a lot of time to think. One of the topics I like to think about is the philosophy of games and fun, like what makes something a game, or whether games can be objectively fun or if it's a purely subjective phenomenon and some games are fun for some people but not others. Some people think that fun is a “preference satisfaction” process – there are things you like, and when you get them that's fun. I'm mostly convinced that's wrong, I think fun is more about the process of engaging with systems in a particular way, but I can't dismiss that perspective completely. Another thing that occurred to me on one of those walks was that “puzzle” and “puddle” are very similar words, and I came up with the idea of two characters who could exist on different ends of a spectrum: Puddle Duck is a joyously exuberant duck that loves running around in the rain, while Puzzle Duck is analytical and likes puzzles and strategy games. I even started composing a sing-song-y poem about them, something reminiscent of poetry aimed at children (these are long walks). Seeing the Rain / Duck / Umbrella prompt inspired me try recall the lines I had come up with before, finish the poem, and illustrate it.

I started with Puddle Duck:

PuddleDuck.jpg

Then I added Puzzle Duck. I had a tough time getting an expression that looked like I wanted it to, my initial attempts kept turning out angry so I had to erase them and try again.

PuddleDuck_0001.jpg

Then I added some raindrops:

PuddleDuck_0002.jpg

Normally I stick with straight pencil images when I'm drawing, I scan them in and clean up the scanning artifacts using a combination of GIMP and Inkscape. If I had done that my final image would have been like this:

PuzzleDuckAndPuddleDuck-BW.png

But I wanted to try doing color for this one, so I experimented with a new process. I went a bit more extreme with the color correction in GIMP and cleaned up stray marks, scanning artifacts, and eraser stuff:

PuzzleDuckAndPuddleDuckCleanedUp.png

Then I used Inskscape to do a bitmap trace to get the lines, which I switched to completely black, hoping this would work like an automatic inking step. Then I traced out the areas for the different colors. And I added the text of the poem on the left.

PuzzleDuckAndPuddleDuck-Color.png

Overall I'm mostly satisfied with the final result (although I wasn't happy with my coloring process, I'll need to either refine it or try something different the next time I try to work with color). Even though I think the philosophy of games is an interesting and non-frivolous topic, I think it is useful to be able to approach the topic in a playful manner, which I think I'm doing in the poem and the illustration. Plus I find it amusing that this post is a nexus of multiple different topics I've been thinking and posting about.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

It's a very cute poem while being rather philosophical! Perhaps puzzle and puddle represent the different hemispheres of the brain (if you agree with left-brained and right-brained theory).

I enjoyed how you shared your creative process, as well as the actual process of creation. Going back to how/why people enjoy games, I guess a small anecdote is something I've noticed between my husband and I... when it comes to tabletop games, he prefers extremely competitive, cut-throat, deep strategic games, and I prefer light, social games where there is overt competition but people don't take it seriously. Naturally this makes it a bit hard to find a tabletop game that suits us both. I put it down to differences in personality, but I guess there is a rabbit-hole we could dive down about how the differences in personality arise. Maybe he should put away the umbrella and I should dry my feet!

I enjoyed reading this post, it's great to see the thought process behind this and where you find your inspiration. 'Puddle' and 'puzzle' do roll off the tongue in such a wonderfully playful manner!

Thank you for joining in with the challenge, but also for producing such a well made and thoughtful post about it.

Resteemed and doodle on!

what you is it a funny post i hope not so just feel board to read this totally waist of time

I found one line a little stumbly and I think a minor tweak is in order. The cadence of the line: Why some things that are fun for you just are not fun for me could be improved

Why some things that are fun for you are just no fun for me is an example of what I mean, but I'm not claiming it's ideal.

I think it depends on the emphasis you place on different words and the rhythm you're reading it with. I think it works if you read it like "Why some things that are fun...". This line did go through a few iterations during the process, you might have preferred some of the others but I also had issues with them in terms the emphasis and rhythm not being necessarily coming through clearly.

As the poet, it first has to work for you.

Also, I do like how you brought several things together with that post -- poetry, doodles, computer drawing processes, game theory, walking.

i am pleased to read and seeing the post

thanks for reading, please share with any Canadian friends of yours!

The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @danmaruschak to be original material and upvoted it!

ezgif.com-resize.gif

To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!

Please note that this is a BETA version. Feel free to leave a reply if you feel this is an error to help improve accuracy.