LINGUISTIC LEVERAGE IN POLITICS

There are some of us today, be it in any country of the Western hemisphere, that practice „magic politics“ – throwing carefully designed words and phrases at others in order to gain a projected unfair subliminal advantage.

I am refereng to the so called antifashists.

What does it actually MEAN to be an antifashist in the 21st centuary ?

It has the same meaning as proclaiming oneself to be an anticriminal, an antirapist or an antithief. It basicly means nothing, since any normal person does not define itself as a negation of anything, but rather sees itself in a positive and affirmative light.

/Of the other ilustriuos groups that enrich our social lives, it is also the „free masons“ that have the need to define themselves as apposed to something (Bible and Christianity primarily), for they have no solid ground of values of their own to build upon:

Jesus lived 33 years, so they have 33 steps of „inlightment“; „we have beaten you Galilean !“ – famous proclamation, and similar pathetic declarations and numerological abracadabras based on Bible…/

It is therefore not the definition of the word „antifashist“ that one should take notice of, but the undertone that it strives to convay „under the radar“ and thus put the „nonconformer“ at a psichological disadvantage:

„We are the righteus ones, and you all should better conform to what we stand for, or bear the consequences“ – most commonly labeling and smearing campaign being just the begining of the „isolate and neutralise“ action that is to deter one from further oposing their selfrighteus „superior values“ (exh. gay marrige and similar „basic human“ rights that, again, surprise-surprise, oppose the Bible) that are inshrined on the moral pedestal of the present day untouchables.

The most common upper hand that they strive to gain, by their colorfull verbal atacks, is to corner a nonconformist/nonbeliever/“a fashist“ into proclaiming and explaining himself as „not being a fashist“. It is basicly equal to trying to win an argument with someone by beginning a debate by explaining first that: „I am not a witch !“ and than continuing to explaining and defending oneself as to why I am not a wich. It is a tryed tactic of the „investigators with agenda“ throughout the history. This is where the wichhunters, sorry, the so called antifashists have already won half the battle. Something to be aware of.

On a subliminal level, the carefully chosen name „anti-something“ is supposed to imply (to cast „a magic spell“) that all those that DO NOT call themselves as such or do not accept the ideas and actions of such groups are by definition fashists, criminals, rapists or thieafs.

It is therefore a very violent and exclusive intent that is hiding and lurking under the pretentious name. The same intent (although not so carefully verbaly packaged in their name) is professed today by the ISIS, the taliban, scientologysts and similar asspiring groups that are intent TO FORCE THE NONBELIEVERS INTO SUBMISSION.

In essence, they are the very thing that they boldly profess they are fighting against – fashist thugs with a fancy name.

It is a cult, and not an ideology. Besides, an ideology does not carry an „anti-“ prefix in its name.

In a down of the birth of the decentralised society of everything (money, insurance, contracts, governments, entertainment, ideas…) these guys seem more and more like an antiquated curiosity of the past in the dusty shelf that contains: whiches, elfs, knights, communists, Boogy man, Santa Claus, Free masons and such… rather than a role model of the future. It has an „expiery date“ written all over it, just like the central banking, and any dictatorship of any „-ism“ there is.