You have no idea what you're talking about and sound like a typical out-of-touch rich kid lmfao
Capitalism didnt raise standards of living, technological advancements did.
States can only exist in capitalist societies. Borders, countries, owning land are all capitalist inventions. Same with imperialism. Note, that genocide from imperialism is just capitalism with land and direct action. Capitalism in current year is just genocide of poor people by restricting basic resources under the guise of money. Money is theft, property is theft. We have enough resources on Earth for everyone to live happily and healthily, but instead we have folk like Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos stealing all the wealth and sacrificing the lives of everyone around them to try to hit the top of the leaderboard. Capitalism is sacrificing the poor's lives to get "Cool Stuff" and just pretending its justified.
Anyone making over 300,000 usd per year has a happiness rating that is stagnant and on par with those that make millions per year, so why have more than that when billions are starving and poor? Because you're a selfish bastard who hates poor people (no other option, sorry).
Anarchism, communism, and intersectionality are the only morally and ethically correct options.
Remember your post about the death penalty? How do you take into account the 50,000 people who die per year in the US because of lack of health insurance? That's capitalism 101. Sacrifice.
Posted using Partiko Android
How do you square this statement and your crypto trading?
And how do you figure you're mainlining the truth here? This kind of black and white thinking is lazy.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I live in a capitalist society and need to eat. Plain and simple 😊
It's not black and white by definition. Intersectionality is an all inclusive position, it's just that we dont want to see people needlessly suffering. Victimless ways of living are better than those that require human sacrifice.
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Then it sounds like you need to revise the use of the word "only". You cannot be sure your way is the only moral path, it's arrogant to claim it, especially as you're saying here you are willing to ignore this for practical reasons (and to have fun, there is an unmistakable Glee in your trading posts).
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You can't ignore capitalism when you live in it. I use it to spread my message of peace and love, so it works out.
I dont understand though, what other options are good besides intersectionality? Love and human rights for all people is essential.
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's true, so perhaps the moral absolutism needs to be rethought.
I'm looking forward to hearing your message of peace and love some day. The evidence of your account postings shows only messages of conflict and hate!
Love is an act, not a perspective or intention. There are many ways to do this and I have yet to be convinced anyone has a 100% right way to do it figured out.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Peace and love through elimination of hate is how I operate. Hate is fundamentally illogical and needs to be eradicated at all costs, I dont have sympathy for those who abuse innocents.
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I guess you haven't seen 1 of the many hundreds of articles i've written? and just because you disagree with me now here on this one, you rudely conclude that I must be "out of touch"...✌ well, i'm sorry you got so triggered by my words,... I know the promotion of voluntary exchanges and private property ownership is quite radical today, sadly lol...
you wouldn't have had those technological advancements without capitalism and private property ownership.
Why do you feel that you have a right to tell other people how much money they should be comfortable living with? It just seems rather.. controlling? Why try to tell other people how to live their life? .. that reeks of statism, force, coercion. I prefer voluntary exchanges and people co-operating based upon mutual benefit which is the essence of capitalism. Anarchism and capitalism are one in the same.
If you want to organize a communist community VOLUNTARILY then I don't care, please leave me out of it. Of course, that is never what communists mean though, they always mean to include everyone in their utopia by force.. well I will never be interested. I am only interested in voluntary and peaceful exchanges, not coerced ones. Communism founded upon such force is no utopia or "moral" high ground.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I just followed you of course, and you know that. Dehumanizing people as "triggered" is also pretty ableist and doesnt really advance a discussion much. I'm talking to you right now and judging what you say in the moment. If that's not good enough feel free to extrapolate on any miscommuniction.
And yes, we would have. Science was developed in less capitalist societies just as well if it better in many places. Capitalism and innovation are not congruent in any fashion. Imagine a world without sharing our knowledge. Why is communism ok when it comes to sharing research, but not ok everywhere else?
Science and data literally explains the happiness index and how it functions. Also it is controlling to prevent billions of people from eating, but o guess that doesnt matter since that's built into the system and not relevant, right?
Anarchy is actually the direct opposite of capitalism. Capitalism directly involves monetary hierarchy that unequalizes the playing field, people will always have more power than others. Anarchy involves a system where we are all equal without rule of state. You cannot have anarchy and capitalism.
"""Voluntary exchange""" for rich people is cool in theory, but again, it's all sacrificing the lives of billions of others. You think capitalism works because you aren't directly exposed to the people that are being thrown away like garbage as a result of your greed and roleplaying. We dont live in a meritocracy and pretending like we do is foolish and ignorant.
Communism doesnt require human force. Climate change is going to force us all to abandon this failed capitalist system soon enough.
Anarchy and communism go hand in hand. No one should have power and rule over others. Capitalism cannot exist with anarchy by definition. You are wrong and very misguided.
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit