Women are the enforcers of social engineering

in politics •  7 years ago 

We live in an Orwellian dystopia already, and it's going to get worse before it gets better. Men and women have been encouraged to act contrary to their inherent, biological natures, and we're witnessing the detrimental effects of gender role-reversal.

Gender Roles

Women are encouraged (or rather peer-pressured) to behave like men, taking on the "alpha male" role in order to succeed in the flourescent halls of multinational corporations. Men are ostracized for behaving as men always have: being assertive, taking risks, and speaking frankly.

Women are told that they are denying their potential if they choose to get married at a young age and have children. There are a small minority of women who have the capacity to excel in traditionally male roles (scientist, businessperson, politician), but our entire society is based around pretending that these exceptions are the rule. Simultaneously, there are countless examples in the media of strong, independent women saving the day with their buffoonish male sidekicks doing more harm than good. If a male is competent in a movie or TV show, he is the bad guy.

Men are told they they are all potential rapists, that they should ask a woman for permission to say hello, much less to kiss her. At the same time, there are plenty of articles encouraging heterosexual men to "experiment" with their "bros." Come on, man, it's not gay if you suck your buddy's dick once in a while!

If he is white, then he has unearned privilege, thus earning him the position of being denied the right to express an opinion contrary to the social justice consensus. "Check your privilege" is code for "shut up," or more commonly, "shut up, Whitey."

If you don't accede to the sexual advances of a gay man, you are homophobic, and your neck is on the chopping block. If you oppose the replacement-level migration of Muslims into Europe, you are a Nazi skinhead.

Men and women are both encouraged to take on the sexual habits of gay men, fornicating with strangers (often after a Tinder swipe). Sexuality, and the purpose of sexuality (the creation of new life) is turned into a cheap commodity.

As politically incorrect as it is to say, the truth is that women are generally passive, and they don't like to buck the system. If a woman lost her social network in the past, the consequences could lead to her demise. Men have a much better chance to survive in untamed nature, and thus are adapted to taking risks.

Feminists are convinced, through constant brainwashing, that they are "fighting the power" (aka "the Evil Patriarchy that has always oppressed women for the benefit of men"). In fact, feminism directly serves the interests of the Money Masters who put men and women in opposition to each other, and, on a more subtle level, our own selves. In either case, your natural inclinations are "wrong," and anachronistic, and acting opposite your biology is the truly enlightened way to live.

To my point:

Women, being inclined to go with the flow, are much more susceptible to propaganda. The first major historic example is Edmund Bernays, nephew to Sigmund Freud, convincing women that smoking cigarettes was a symbol of independence as a PR stunt on behalf of tobacco companies. And women are a powerful force when it comes to population control. During WW1, in the US, women would give flowers to men who didn't enlist in the army as a way of saying, in effect: "You're a pussy."

Another characteristic of women is they are generally higher in the psychological trait Agreeableness. This has its roots in biology, so it's not a bad thing per se, and has evolutionary advantages. However, when our entire society is predicated on conflict avoidance, and when people aren't allowed to hash out their differences verbally, it inevitably leads to violence. This is why free speech is so essential. The biggest threat to free speech currently is so-called Social Justice Warriors, who are largely female (along with a number of effeminate males) high in trait Agreeableness.

Male Morality vs. Female Morality

Men and women live in different moral worlds. One is not necessarily "better" than the other, as they evolved to serve different functions. That being said, I might be slightly biased in favor of the male version.

Male morality is abstract and universal. It is the morality of law and order. It says: if it is wrong to steal, stealing is always wrong no matter the circumstances.

Female morality is geared toward raising children, and therefore it has a lot more room for interpretation. It is subjective. The baby is always right, no matter what it does, because it's helpless and doesn't know any better.

Female morality is fine for babies, but when it's applied to "marginalized groups" like blacks and Muslims, we get huge problems. We turn a blind eye to the absurdly disproportionate crime rates of blacks in the US because they're "victims of oppression."

This infantalization leads to glaring double standards and travesties of justice. Look at the Michael Brown case for example, where an aggressive black criminal assaulted a police officer, and was unfortunately killed because of his poor choices. This led to massive riots based on media hype and distortions about the incident (the "hands up, don't shoot" lie). These riots involved massive amounts of looting, property damage, and violence. All because we side with the supposed "victim" regardless of the facts. The victim (infant) is never wrong.

Conclusion

Women instinctively side with victors. In a tribal conflict, if women continued to oppose the other tribe who killed her husband, she and her children would be killed. It makes much more sense for her to be able to flip a switch that allows her to accept her new circumstance.

The powers that be, whether you call them the Illuminati, the Zionists, the Jesuits, the lizard-people, or whatever you like, have pitted us against each other by biological category: man/woman, white/black, liberal-brain/conservative-brain. These groups are naturally going to be in conflict, but it's a matter of degree. If we are to achieve harmony, we must understand and heed nature, and speak out against the insanity of the modern world before we lose the right to do so.

If you are a man reading this, your job is to become the best person you can be, and that includes becoming attractive to the opposite sex. Women don't love losers, unless they display a high degree of self-confidence. Rather than putting on a facade, become a man with integrity. A winner. And together we can make our views, honest ones that reflect the natural truth, the dominant views. When women migrate to our side en masse, we know we've won.

If you're a woman reading this, you have a lot more leeway to speak your mind. People will listen to you. Blonde in the Belly of the Beast is a great example, as is Roaming Millenial. You have the ring of power. Use it for good.

That's all for now.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Congratulations @cyrustheaverage! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You made your First Vote
You made your First Comment
You got a First Vote
You got a First Reply
You published your First Post

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!