Do you know what a Central Bank
is, and what it represents/ stands for?
RE: Healthcare in the USA...are there any GOOD arguments against a single payer system?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Healthcare in the USA...are there any GOOD arguments against a single payer system?
Yes, I do know what a central bank is. What are your thoughts?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
When u talk of
paying extra taxes
(in ur initial post), i presume that u refer toa single payer system
asGOV pay for the healthcare
!?! The ideology is good/ perfect! HOWEVER... The problem with that is that as a population gets older (which happens inALL
countries around the world), the next generations populus numbers shrink/ get smaller/ become less! This is where the IDEA is flawed/ incorrect/ doesn
t work. In the UK - We have thisEXACT PROBLEM
happening. The NHS is at breaking-point, as our healthcare is TAX-FUNDED. The reason why I talk of Central Banks (my initial question to ur initial post) is because... ``As a population of a country (any/ ALL COUNTRIES) get older, thetax revenue
received by GOV alters! In the UK/ U.S.A etc. etc. etc. taxes are generated by (mainly) working and spending money. This thesecond flaw
with this IDEA! As a population ages, they dont work, they RETIRE!... and they don
t COMMIT alot of money (spending) to buy the FAMILY HOME etc. etc. as they are not at that time in their lives! OAPs/ The elderly/ the aged/ pensioners etc. outweigh (in numbers/ mass) compared to the next generation (their children). AND then... their grandchildrens numbers/ mass r
less in number! The NHS (in the UK) willeventually
be privatised sooner, rather than later! XxDownvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for the well thought out post! I understand your point, but I still think a government single payer system could work. In the US we have social security and the government planned for the shrinking population and set aside enough money for the boomers. HOWEVER the funds were not protected by law and the government dipped into social security funds to pay for other things, hence the slight shortage we have now. This could all be avoided by simple language in the law saying taxes paid correlate to the population size and that funds cannot be allocated elsewhere. In this system I believe the US can still save money on healthcare.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit