not a grassroots organisation
the jesuit mask/ anonymous/ occupy are well-known controlled opposition groups, thought to be funded by soros.
if there is a plan then someone thought of it and told someone else, which means there are leaders.
the chances of anyone, let alone a few thousand untrained, aimless, leaderless rebels all with the same mask on, stopping the planned one world government, religion, and ensuing mass persecution are so close to zero no one could actually measure the difference.
terms like 'big brother' are a real put-off, and what's with the one eye? no one true would go anywhere near that symbolism.
we cannot win this fight. but there are alternatives to fighting.
with peace & love & grace :-)
Thats the spirit bro! - Quite obvious you did not read the linked document though.
This is a grassroots movement and it is in not an "anonymous" movement. The mask is used here to represent that there are no leaders. The whole plan is known from the beginning so no leaders are needed. You make it sound like everyone who is "anonymous" is a Soros financed lackey. Of course you cannot mean that?
A plan is not the same as having leaders - in this case it is the opposite. If you have leaders then they decide. Now they cannot decide as there is a plan ;)
We Are Big Brother means that the people are to surveillance government, not the other way around. Why would this be a problem to you?
To love is to act, not just to say it. To love is to care and to care is to take meaningful action. We outnumber them, they out-organise us. To just say peace and love is not enough, obviously! We need to unite and organise, still we cannot trust anyone, so we need to have a plan that is known from the beginning.
Please read the document before further comments and replies because this one is totally irrelevant as you will soon understand.
Great song by the way! <3 <3 <3
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
thank you for answering, most satisfactory too - so what is the plan, and who decided it?
unite and organise, excellent, but to do what? there are already many organisations, professional and voluntary, specialised and general, that lobby governments and businesses for all kinds of things, mostly unsuccessfully but not always.
or is it unite politically? or militarily?
obviously i haven't read the document, i'm chatting with you so you can tell me. peace :-)
edit - ok i skim-read the document but it reminds me of this: http://sebpearce.com/bullshit/
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well, lets put it this way:
Do you have the right to know the full truth about the decisions that are taken in your name and that determine the conditions for how you can live your life?
That is the aim of the movement. To make politics totally and unconditionally transparent. To progress to a new era of politics/social organisation of truth and honesty.
It is said that the fundamental problem of politics and social organisation is how to assure representation. How to assure that those with the mandate to decide actually decide in the interest of the people.
Technological development has for the first time in known history given us the ability to solve that problem. We have the ability to use technology to assure honesty and truth in politics. We just have to unite and make it happen.
The document describes how to build the mentality and momentum for the masses to actually make it happen.
Hope it makes sense to you. Personally I see this as the only solution that everyone can unite behind.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
it's a noble idea for sure - transparent government would be excellent, but pretty impossible to achieve.
what kind of voting system is desired?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, not easy at all! But maybe the only significant change that actually can happen, even though it is extremely hard to imagine that anything can happen that is not in favour for those in power.
About the voting system I cannot say. Thats for each nation or location so decide. Do you have some idea or suggestion on that point?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
yes, all government is a bad idea - having a centralised authority to rob everyone at gunpoint/ risk of jail and decide how to divvy up the proceeds is not my idea of a perfect world.
if you're going to have a mass movement, have one for self-responsibility and the end of the tax system, slowly shrinking the state so it almost doesn't exist. if this idea seems a bit 'far out' it shows how narrow most people's thinking has been allowed to become.
larkin rose is good on the dangers of the state, he uses some great illustrations, and most of the mises institute is libertarian to one degree or another.
lots more good writers in the past and present to discover on this most fascinating of topics.
on the road to no government whatsoever, i'd have a true proportional representation voting system, so that one major party or other does not get to rule the roost on behalf of the banksters.
however, the ultimate goal for free-thinking individuals should be to have no government or central banks at all, leaving everyone considerably richer and therefore able to take care of the less well-off/ sick in their families and neighbourhoods themselves.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Considering how big part of the population that is ready to abandon government and how big part that is willing to have a transparent government, I'd say that a transparent government is without doubt the superior way to get rid of government.
We live in a corporate fascism. Government is today just a tool for the corporations, banks and secret societies. It is their pr-organisation. If anything is to change the people needs to awaken first.
And I have to say something that I'm afraid you will not like at all. Maybe I'm wrong. The idea that the government is the enemy is a trick played by the elite. That's why the term "deep state" has been made so popular. Of course they control the alternative media, why shouldn't they have established there?
To work for the abolishment of government is conflict and opposition, it is to be their pawn and it will never ever lead to anything. It is to reluctantly chose servitude.
The only way to win is by awakening the masses. Give them a solution that already makes sense to them and eventually they will adjust to a world view that justifies that solution.
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
government is servitude. being responsible for one's own property and family is freedom. when no one else decides what you have to spend your money on.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit