Still, I believe his authorization to strike the Syrian air base was premature. There was no investigation into the identity of the perpetrators actually deploying the Sarin chemical attack and the US should not take its own initiative in attacking any sovereign country.
I agree. Not to mention the cleanup crews showed water trucks and people that were not dressed properly to deal with sarin. Water trucks would actually be more an indicator for Chlorine Gas.
Yes that was VERY premature. I also looked at John McCain and Nancy Pelosi happy and dancing over it, and that generally tells you it was not a good thing. They are both war mongers, so them being happy over such thins is generally a bad thing.
He still has a long way to go to match Obama's death count. Actually, in my mind that may be the only thing I'd consider a crime. Yet due to the increasing powers past presidents/congress have given the executive branch, I don't know that it was technically illegal. Perhaps not impeachable. Do I believe it was wrong? Definitely. It made zero sense for Assad to use gas, especially when things were starting to lean his way in terms of relations. It does make sense for it to be done and blamed on him (false flag) so that Trump comes back towards the perpetual war footing.
Exactly, the absolutely worst thing anyone can do is to blow up sarin containing weapons/containers. The resulting spread of contaminants would cause widespread death to the nearby population centers. There was no way any sarin was kept at that base. This also follows a couple of prior incidents where the rebels used chemical weapons and tried blaming Assad for its use.....which has been proven to be false flags as well. Also the reports of Russia being given advanced warning of the attack was seen as very controversial at the time with Russia's denial of it and the rebel attacks on the base soon after our missile bombardment made it very suspicious.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit