Eric 'Whoru' Williams' latest newsletter.

in politics •  7 years ago 


Hi Group, 

I received an email purporting to provide a list of countries that still accord birthright citizenship, listing the United States as the only country that still utilizes this practice.  

Here below is my same old response:   WRONG!!!   

There is actually no birthright citizenship in the United States, no matter what "Laws" CONgress might have enacted. 

It is all part of the fraud to re-establish commoner subjugation as intended by the Founding Fathers, as may be discerned by a more careful reading of THEIR CONstitution.  (Please convey this to Mark Levin.  Maybe he will write another book where he will actually present the history of this republic accurately.)    

Citizenship is a form of servitude, this is an undeniable fact!  

Servitude is as inherent in the word citizen as colors are in the words red or black.    

Moreover, the Thirteenth Amendment prohibits involuntary servitude in the United States, therefore, the only persons who can volunteer themselves into citizenship servitude, are those persons who have attained the age of maturity, unofficially recognized in the United States as being sixteen years of age.     

Based on the foregoing, how could it be reasonably possible for any newborn infant to be declared a citizen merely because the infant was born within the political boundaries of the United States?   

It is all part of the fraudulent intent to return the United States back to an open faced republic, where there are two political classes as is established by the Founders in THEIR CONstitution; the first being the ruling class, being the People, of the United States, established in the Preamble; and the second being the subject class, citizens of the United States, created in Section Two of Article One, but not defined until the Fourteenth Amendment, in 1868, wherein it is established that citizens of the United States are subject to the jurisdiction of the Executive Branch, such being the President.   

Pay attention to the actual words, not to what you have been indoctrinated to believe by those who are striving to further enslave you.   

Cheers,   

I am Eric Williams, The Radical In The Twilight Zone  


If you haven't had the pleasure of meeting Eric, as I have, you are certainly missing out.

He is a kindly gentleman in his 80's.

Eric was in the struggle for freedom from the CONstitution, and it's dupes, long before most of us were born.

In his own words:

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/tscmd/tc/27767

http://exopolitics.blogs.com/breaking_news/2014/06/eric-williams-sovereignty-personal-freedom-and-the-grand-jury.html



Have a perfectly peaceful day.

Keep working, stop spending your change.   No war, but the class war!!

Viva!   Tradeqwik, the exchange that pays you!

Minds.com

Vote FBA King of the World

How to win in court!

How to win in court for far less!!


Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

resteemed

I'm a Citizen of the State of Florida and subject to the fictions that the federal congress creates as well as my State.

When I bought property I accepted the State's protection of my land titles and also accepted its subjugation..... "Subjugated”, to use a word of the sovereign movement, not mine.

I'm not inclined to be a sovereign. It's too expensive to raise an army to fight off the lazy interlopers or the tax men with guns and badges who have sworn fealty to the current legal fictions, to collect taxes on my fee simple title and who have sworn fealty to those same ideas and fictions created for us to protect our codified rights as humans..... And our property rights. Otherwise it's constantly dealing with the Interlopers and would be competitor extortionists who operate without a hint of due process or rights protected by the law but by charisma and guns.

The age of warlords is over until a new age dawns; I choose law and order. Paying the police and military to act on my behalf who take an oath to do so without swearing fealty to a monarch is a win-win.

I'm all for freedom and survival of the fittest when it comes to ingesting mind and mood altering chemicals. Legalizing everything would take a huge strain off of Law Enforcement, as well as increase the tax coffers to fix the 60 year old crumbling freeway system we all so much enjoy.

I hear the sarcasm about muh roads and how they can get built without the State but without the power of eminent domain the land could not be used without non guaranteed treaties between sovereigns to donate the land for the road to the public to use.

Without the rule of law life would be like living with the Hatfield's and McCoy's at the very mildest of what aggression lives in this world.

We have a bill of rights in this country. The problem isn't Government it's the fact that our voices are diluted by the fact that congress is capped.

I'm a Citizen of the State of Florida and subject to the fictions that the federal congress creates as well as my State.

Are you sure?
@marcstevens
Eric Whoru

I'm not inclined to be a sovereign.

Ok, but stop forcing your subservience on me, eh?
Can I get my right to be free from your masters recognized?

It's too expensive to raise an army to fight

Good neighbors work in the free world.
I lived in 6 different states in Mexico from 11 to 13 and didn't see violence, nor crime, once.
There was some, it was in the papers, but bad people exist.
Just not in the neighborhoods I lived in.

And our property rights.

Rule by force is the disease, who and how are just symptoms.

I choose law and order

If you want to embrace your slavery, that is your choice.
Unfortunate, if you ask me, but then you didn't, eh?

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

@marcstevens Interesting salesman he is. And I respect your opinion. His too and I understand his position on the legality or lack thereof of jusisdiction based in contact law. He is correct however when dealing with criminal infractions having victims the right of this State is By conquest, to mediate the cases.

and No I'll keep making the case for a State but with clear intention to protect Freedom not to stifle it

It's Counter Intuitive but that's how a proper society functions. Taxation.

We don't live in a vacuum and government is necessary to resolve our differences otherwise it's the Hatfields and McCoys without the semblance of the rule of law at its least. At its worst it's being physically enslaved as is currently happening in Libya.

Whether the communal funds/resources that help raise up the standard of living for the whole community is gathered by actual extortion, coercion, taxation or donation, the method doesn't matter as long as it's used for the benefit of the public.

If you don't like it or feel you're special and due a special set of rules there are plenty of secluded / isolated places to buy and move to outside of the Rule of Law; well not really but some places are so remote that it's defacto lawless

It works better at the local community level where things can be done by donation benefitting "friends" as opposed to benefitting "outsiders" but it need not matter if the whole society is benefitted.

Most people's troubles with coercion is that they aren't part of the coercion team and turn into rebels against that which is good for the whole.

But make no mistake I am not in favor of redistribution of wealth, however payment for services rendered to the community by contractors is acceptable.

And yes I am referring to my own definition of increasing the standard of living through order and smart and careful usage of resources respecting individual rights codified in the Bill of Rights.

But I'll admit that the system has gotten out of balance and we see the politicians not paying any attention to the fact that we elect them because they represent so many people it makes it incredibly difficult to oust them in favor of a person who takes his que from his constituents rather than the monied lobbyists.

This is why I am trying to start a grass roots movement to add seats to the House to get back to the constitutional Ratio of 1:30,000. This isn't enlarging government (adding new departments and full time employees to "serve" us is); adding so many representatives that the special interests cannot have a logistical possibility of controlling elections is adding accountability to the house without the corruption of "donations". If we can provide some political action relief paying taxes will become more voluntary but never completely.

https://steemit.com/anarchy/@adconner/the-greatest-conspiracy-ever-perpetrated-on-the-united-states-of-america-and-no-one-even-realizes-it

Loading...

@adconner you seem to believe you have more rights than the common man. So let me ask you this simple question, but please pay very close attention the wording of the question. Let's agree to the language that we were all taught. The question follows:

Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves?

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

Rights are not delegated, they exist or get regulated. The Right of Conquest exists for us all. We all have the same rights as Genghis Kahn, Alexander, Augustus, Constantine, Charlemagne, The III Percenters, George Washington, Napoleon, Hugo Chavez and Joseph Roberts. But me?.... Without exercising those rights I have immensely less responsibility and problems... but if you're feeling froggy you too can jump, rebel and rule from the ashes here but without my support; nay... my active resistance because what we have today is far better than any world an Ancap will produce or And Ancom will provide. But if you do get froggy and attempt your own independence, there are a few extortionist competetors you'd have to fend off as well.

Where is it codified or even an accepted fact that the State must show that a criminal defendant has peacefully acquiesced to the legitimize the State's Jurisdiction that was gained by earlier Right of Conquest over or Treaty with a previous Jurisdiction?

@vidanatural
Did I pay close enough attention?

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

@freebornangel thank you for taking the time to discuss this with me. I've lived other places as well. Here is one on my favorites: Panama City with Police.

I have heard good things about panama, I hope to make it sometime.

Ideally I would like to go to guatamala, they just elected a comedian prez.

Panama is a very libertarian minded people but they also believe in helping out their neighbors. They have dueling health care systems. A high social security payroll tax paying for public health care but smart enough not to curtail private healthcare insurance (topping up) for service at private clinics. This policy has resulted in very low insurance rates and allows insurers to adequately evaluate their risk while providing decent care for the chronically sick and injured in the public arena.

I would guess that the people are much better 'represented' in panama?

Vigilante neighbors are my preference,...and the Caribbean is hardly indicative of the mainland according to my sources, I haven't been there.

Caribbean? Central America? Something got mixed in the Translation.

Yeah, sorry, it was in the title.

I'd sure like to get into the barrios and see for myself.

When I was in Acapulco there were several murders, when the police showed up the people said, 'He was a bad man.', and nothing else.

Vigilante neighbors kept the passage ways safe there.
I walked some of the worst streets after dark and never had even a hint of problems.