FOR THE MASSES OF ASSES - JUST TRYING TO FIX STUPID AGAIN

WHAT DOES FEDERAL REALLY MEAN

You always hear the phrase, pay your federal income tax . Now just what does this phrase consist of?
Five words. The use of the word Federal is very important because all people believe it to mean the
Federal government has an income tax that you must pay. But, why is it that no court will come down
on the Private IRS when it says it collects for federal tax? It is proven to be private and an arm of the
federal Reserve. This federal Reserve controls “The Bank” and the “International Monetary Fund".

Instead of going into the proofs by statute and making this a long writing, we find that the agents of the
IRS are controlled by foreign operatives, namely the Governor of the IMF and the second alternate
should the Governor die, quit etc.. That is the Federal Reserve Chairman. Also the Alien Property Custodian, who
you know as the Attorney General of the United States, is also the head member of the Interpol in this
country and is a foreign agent. Both he and the Secretary of the Treasury under 26 U.S.C. 7401, are
who all agents take their directive orders from.

Are they collecting for the federal government a “federal” income tax? No they are not. Now we come to those five little words of the above phrase and one word is federal. We all were taught it meant the national government. Well I think you are going to be very surprised as to what follows on that little misinterpreted word “Federal" as we trace back it's origin, called entomology.

[Editor: see the above corrections to the information in red]

From the 1828 Webster's Dictionary
FEDERAL– a. from L. faedus, a league, allied perhaps to Eng. Wed, Sax . Weddian,* * *.

Pertaining to a league or contract; derived from an agreement or covenant between parties ,
particularly between nations.

So the real meaning of “federal” is a contract or agreement and has nothing to do with a particular type
government, although it was a contract that formed government. So to get the point across I will use
“federal” in place of contract or agreement as they are one in the same. Well now, IRS is private
agency. You federal with IRS when filing any form under perjury, i.e. W-4, 1040 or any IRS FORM .
Your signature compels you to the”federal” that you owe an obligation to the “parties” as listed above.
Note it said parties and nothing to do with government in it's federal makeup. It said particular to, but
not inclusive. The next Webster's defining of the word will show it is not exclusive to nations.

Consisting in a compact between parties , particularly and chiefly between states or nations; YOU
ARE NOT MENTIONED HERE AS YOU HAVE NO CONTRACT WITH A STATE OR A NATION.
As stated by the judge in the Padleford case;

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of
the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it. The States are the
parties to it. And they may complain. If they do they are entitled to redress. Or they may waive the right
to complain."

Right here is all the proof you need that you are not a party to any compact ( contract/Agreement) with
the federal government or state government for that matter under any constitution.

So we move on in #2 of Webster's definition; founded on alliance by contract or mutual agreement; * * .
Your mutual agreement is with a private organization using the word “federal” in a fraud, because of
people's ignorance. Remember words are used against you every time it is in the criminal's best
interest.

Now when you look at Black's Law dictionary, they are carefully couched in constitutional
terms and nations and compacts between the states and never use “Federal” as defined by Webster's.

Even Ballentine's uses it, as does Blacks. Now let's move to present day ( 1969) Webster's 7th
Collegiate Dictionary. This now states what The Law dictionaries state and has thrown out the
etymology of the word federal so you would have no idea it means a contract between parties, leading
you to believe everything “federal” pertains to government.

Hum, OK, so what about federal express? Does that mean government express?

So, I happen to have a 1911 Webster's unabridged dictionary and the definition of “federal” is exactly
word for word, the same as the 1828 Dictionary. So what happened in 1913 that changed the definition
of “federal” to mean only pertaining to government ?

Think. Words are changed by men to mean what they want it to mean. The Random House Dictionary
1967 uses Webster's 1828 definition, but also includes what the Law dictionaries define federal as. Here
is proof as to how a word changes over the years by men that want control by starting to shove aside
what “federal” really means. So the real word “FEDERAL” meant contract between men (parties) or
agreement between them.

So now you have a federal with the IRS and you, in the forms or statement you sign. When IRS takes
you to court, that judge is sitting in equity due to that federal between you and the IRS, and he rightly
rules always in favor of the IRS because you are breaching the federal (contract) you voluntarily made
with them. For your “federal income tax” is in reality a contract tax, which you pay the private IRS for the
use of the federal reserve note.

This is a simple explanation because you would have to read all I have written on admiralty, the foreign
control by the international bankers and the control of the private bar Association over the equity contract you placed yourself in, by signing the agreement of the IRS FORM, no matter what it might be. Now this is where
the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) kicks in. There are cases I have posted from time to time that proves they operate in the UCC due to your “federal” with them.

Sounds odd when you describe that contract with them doesn't it?

The cases are :
UNITED STATES v. KIMBELL FOODS, INC., ET AL. No. 77-1359 SUPREME COURT OF THE
UNITED STATES, 440 U.S. 715; 99 S. Ct. 1448; 1979 U.S. LEXIS 30; 59 L. Ed. 2d 711; 20 Collier
Bankr. Cas. (MB) 1; 26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (Callaghan) 1 and FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FORT
WORTH, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. No. 555-83C, UNITED STATES CLAIMS
COURT 8 Cl. Ct. 774; 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (Callaghan) 1583, September 27, 1985.

That is your “voluntary nature” of the private income tax, under fraud of the use of words to ensnare
you. Once voluntary it then becomes mandatory to “pay your contract ( federal) income tax” .

THE INFORMER 2007